Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6153253
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T20:03:54+00:00 2026-05-23T20:03:54+00:00

Suppose I have a pointer *p which pointer to 10 memory blocks on the

  • 0

Suppose I have a pointer *p which pointer to 10 memory blocks on the heap. Now, instead of free() it, I clear it manually with NULL (or ‘\0’) like this:

for (int i = 0; i < length; ++i{
     p[i] = '\0';
}

Is this considered a memory block is freed when every bit is cleared to zero? Or, I have to use free() to tell the operating system that the memory block is really freed and is usable (I guess)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T20:03:57+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 8:03 pm

    The OS has data structures in the heap that keeps track of what’s allocated and where. Using malloc and free updates these structures, you cannot do it manually. You are leaking memory if you just zero the memory contents.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose we have a situation like this. Suppose instead of p = &global; we
i have a pointer or variable which stores the address like 0xb72b218 now i
Suppose I have some pointer, which I want to reinterpret as static dimension array
Please suppose I have a function that accepts a pointer as a parameter. This
Suppose I have a design like this: Object GUI has two objects: object aManager
Let's suppose I have a struct like this: struct my_struct { int a; int
Suppose I have a pointer to image data which has 3 channels (RGB), 8
Suppose I have a stringbuilder in C# that does this: StringBuilder sb = new
Suppose I have a function which takes variadic arguments ( ... ) or a
hi have a COM visible API in C# which looks like the following: public

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.