Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8049791
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T06:53:02+00:00 2026-06-05T06:53:02+00:00

Suppose I have a stateless bean: @Stateless(name = fooBean) @LocalBean public class Foo {

  • 0

Suppose I have a stateless bean:

@Stateless(name = "fooBean")
@LocalBean
public class Foo {
...
}

I want to create a mock for testing (with CDI)

@Alternative @Specializes
public class FooMock extends Foo {
...
}

I register the mock in beans.xml, and when I run it with OpenEJB, I get the following exception:

...
Caused by: javax.naming.NameAlreadyBoundException:
openejb/Deployment/fooBean/com.company.Foo!LocalBeanHome

It seems to me that the container creates an interface for Foo because of @LocalBean which is now implemented by FooMock, too. OpenEJB tries to bind the two classes with the with same name of same generated interface, which is not possible.

Of course, if I comment out @Stateless and @LocalBean in Foo class, it works fine.

Any idea or suggestion to solve this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T06:53:03+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 6:53 am

    Rather do something like:

    @Local
    public interface Foo {
    ...
    }
    
    @Stateless
    public class FooBean implements Foo {
    ...
    }
    

    Then make your mock.

    @Alternative
    @Specializes
    public class FooMock implements Foo {
    ...
    }
    

    However I recommend you take a look at Arquillian it will make your testing so much easier without the need for @Alternative and special beans.xml entries for tests.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose have following beach definition: <bean id=singletonBean class=...> <property name=instanceBean ref=instanceBean/> </bean> <bean id=instanceBean
Suppose I have: public class foobar { public int lorem; public int ipsum; }
Suppose I have string Name and Image Photo as properties of a class in
Suppose I have the following HTML: <form id=myform> <input type='checkbox' name='foo[]'/> Check 1<br/> <input
Suppose I want to create a (stateless) WCF service with three methods exposed on
Suppose you have the following object hierarchy: class Vehicle { public: virtual ~Vehicle() {}
Suppose I have BaseClass with public methods A and B, and I create DerivedClass
Suppose I have this: @Transactional(rollbackFor = NotificationException.class) public interface PersonManagerService { public void addPerson(Person
Suppose I have an IEnumerable such as a List(TValue) and I want to keep
Suppose I have a PL/SQL stored procedure as follows: PROCEDURE do_something(foo VARCHAR2 DEFAULT NULL)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.