Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8643145
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T11:57:38+00:00 2026-06-12T11:57:38+00:00

Suppose I have a ViewGroup that can contain several optional children views, say a

  • 0

Suppose I have a ViewGroup that can contain several optional children views, say a VideoView, an ImageView and a few optional buttons.

Are significant resources wasted if I include all possible children views in the layout file but set all of them to visibility gone by default, but change visibility as appropriate at runtime?

Is it better just to add the views at runtime as needed? Is there another approach that would be more sensible? Fragments?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T11:57:39+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 11:57 am

    I prefer to create them all and hide them. I’ve noticed that a most of the built-in Android layouts I’ve looked at do the same. Personally, I think it cuts down on NullPointerExceptions and the checks needed to avoid them.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I have: Toby Tiny Tory Tily Is there an algorithm that can easily
Suppose I have a pure virtual method in the base interface that returns to
Suppose I have a static method of my class that returns an object of
Suppose I have a class Baz that inherits from classes Foo and Bar ,
Suppose I have a process that is updating a record and encounters a record
Suppose i have a class which extends ViewGroup public class MapView extends ViewGroup It
Suppose I have a data frame, df, that looks like: f t1 t2 t3
Suppose we have 2 Arrays say : A [] => 1 2 3 4
supposed we know that ViewGroup extends View. Further we have a generic, parametrized class
Suppose I have a stringbuilder in C# that does this: StringBuilder sb = new

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.