Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6110325
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T14:30:10+00:00 2026-05-23T14:30:10+00:00

Suppose I have an empty interface class IBaseInterface which is used only to label

  • 0

Suppose I have an empty interface class IBaseInterface which is used only to “label” implementing classes as being interfaces themselves.

Is there any way to do something like this?

For example:

public class MyClass : T where T : IBaseInterface
{
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T14:30:10+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 2:30 pm

    No, you can’t do that, since the compiler has to know which interface the class implements when you declare the class. You can have generic parameters to the interface, but the actual interface has to be specified.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose we have: interface Foo { bool Func(int x); } class Bar: Foo {
Suppose I have a class like class Empty{ Empty(int a){ cout << a; }
Suppose I have a class module clsMyClass with an object as a member variable.
I have a UITableView with two sections, which are both empty when my application
Suppose i have class Person { public int Id {get;set;} public string Name {get;set;}
Let's suppose I have a string str which consists of characters default to hexadecimal
Suppose I have class hierarchy like the one shown in picture. Suppose I need
Suppose I have a model: class Question < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :title # it has
Suppose you have 2 different ASP.NET applications in IIS. Also, you have some ASCX
Suppose I have a stringbuilder in C# that does this: StringBuilder sb = new

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.