Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6545613
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T11:36:26+00:00 2026-05-25T11:36:26+00:00

Suppose I have over 100 files called in via require_once() command. Is this inducing

  • 0

Suppose I have over 100 files called in via require_once() command. Is this inducing a significant burden over the load of the server?

If so, what are some possible ways I can reduce this burden while still including the same number of files.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T11:36:26+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 11:36 am

    Yes, requiring lots of files has a significant impact on performance because every file has to be read and parsed on every page load.

    Using an opcode cache like APC or one of its many alternatives will reduce this overhead to almost 0 from the second call, as the file will already be parsed and available in the cache.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I have this string: string str = The quick brown fox jumps over
Suppose I have 500 jar files linked to my program totaling over 500 MB
so 1GvG:s/..../g can replace over an entire buffer However, suppose I have multiple vim
Suppose I have a stringbuilder in C# that does this: StringBuilder sb = new
Suppose I have a table called Companies that has a DepartmentID column. There's also
Suppose we have a method that accepts a value of an enumeration. After this
Suppose I have this code: -(SomeOtherType*) getMyObject { SomeType someObject = [[SomeType alloc] init];
Suppose if I have a random time series that I want to interpolate over
Suppose I have this table: ID | description ------------------- 5 | The bird flew
Suppose you have 3 arrays you want to loop over, with lengths x, y,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.