Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7699389
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T22:27:58+00:00 2026-05-31T22:27:58+00:00

Suppose I have the following code function myFunction(param, callback) { … if (err) {

  • 0

Suppose I have the following code

function myFunction(param, callback) {
    ...
    if (err) {
        console.log("error");
        console.log(err);
    }
    else {
        callback(data);
    }
}

In the case of no error, the callback is called. In the case of an error, it is not. Suppose the calling function looks something like the following

myFunction(param, function(data) {
...
});

Are there memory leak issues or similar? Is there a better way to handle this scenario?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T22:27:59+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 10:27 pm

    A JavaScript object will not be eligible for reclamation as long as it is strongly-reachable: that is, if it can be reached by traversing the object graph from a root object (which basically amounts to a global property or, possibly closed-over, variable). Any object that is no longer strongly reachable is no longer accessible via JavaScript and will be reclaimed by the GC (when the GC feels like it).

    In this case the function-object (callback) passed to myFunction is only strongly-reachable for the duration of the function call when it is accessible via the callback parameter*. Because the function-object is not strongly-reachable after the function (e.g. it was not saved to a global property) then the function-object is eligible for reclamation – along with any function scopes that it referenced should they no longer be strongly-reachable – as soon as the function terminates.

    Thus in this case, there is no “memory leak”. However, imagine this case:

    window.myCallbacks = []
    function myFunction(param, callback) {
        ...
        window.myCallbacks.push(callback)  // hmm, maybe always strongly-reachable?
    }
    

    Happy coding.


    Technically, a real smart JavaScript engine could determine that the object named by callback was no longer strongly-reachable (via callback) in the “if” branch. I am not sure if any of the JS engines actually go this far, but the question becomes more interesting when talking about function scopes bound in closures (and if this keeps all the objects named by all the variables, even those not accessed later, strongly-reachable).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I have the following code: class siteMS { ... function __CONSTRUCT() { require
Suppose I have following code: def foo(s): A dummy function foo. For example: >>>
Fellow JQuery hackers, hello :-) Suppose you have the following code: $('.links').click(function(){ //Do something
Suppose I have the following code: class some_class{}; some_class some_function() { return some_class(); }
Suppose I have following code package memoryleak; public class MemoryLeak { public static int
Suppose I have the following code: foreach(string str in someObj.GetMyStrings()) { // do some
Suppose I have the following C code. unsigned int u = 1234; int i
Say suppose I have the following Java code. public class Example { public static
Suppose I have the following: using(var ctx = DataContextFactory.Create(0)) { ... Some code ...
Suppose I have a line of code that starts like the following: Func1(Func2(Func3 Is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.