Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 53677
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T17:06:03+00:00 2026-05-10T17:06:03+00:00

Suppose I have the following declaration: class Over1 { protected: class Under1 { };

  • 0

Suppose I have the following declaration:

class Over1 {    protected:       class Under1       {       }; }; 

I know that I could do the following:

class Over2 : public Over1 {    protected:         class Under2 : public Under1         {         }; }; 

But is there a way to declare Under2 without Over2?

Since you would have to extend Over1 to use any derivative of Under1 this may seem silly, but in this situation there might be 30 different flavors of Under. I can either:

  • Put them all inside Over1 : Not attractive since Over2 may only use 1 or 2 of them
  • Put them each in their own version of Over : Not attractive since then you will have to multiply inherit from almost the same class.
  • Find a way to create children of Under1 without creating children of Over1

So is this possible?

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T17:06:04+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 5:06 pm

    Using templates and explicit specializations you can do this with just one additional class declaration in Over1.

    class Over1 { protected:   class Under1   {   };    template <typename T>   class UnderImplementor; };  struct Under2Tag; struct Under3Tag; struct Under4Tag;  template <> class Over1::UnderImplementor<Under2Tag> : public Over1::Under1 { };  template <> class Over1::UnderImplementor<Under3Tag> : public Over1::Under1 { };  template <> class Over1::UnderImplementor<Under4Tag> : public Over1::Under1 { }; 

    Hope this helps.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 88k
  • Answers 88k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Normally the items get populated to the cache by Hibernate… May 11, 2026 at 5:44 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer A similar situation occurs at our company, where the database… May 11, 2026 at 5:44 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The WHERE part of a query (the "WHERE clause") is… May 11, 2026 at 5:44 pm

Related Questions

I'm looking at some GXT code for GWT and I ran across this use
Suppose I have the following CSS rule in my page: body { font-family: Calibri,
Suppose I have the following code: class some_class{}; some_class some_function() { return some_class(); }
Suppose I have the following C code. unsigned int u = 1234; int i

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.