Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 794055
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T22:15:15+00:00 2026-05-14T22:15:15+00:00

Suppose I have two SQL Server 2008 databases, A and B. They initially were

  • 0

Suppose I have two SQL Server 2008 databases, A and B. They initially were created with the intention to be separate, but over time have grown to both have constant references (in sprocs, views, etc) to each other. It’s gotten to the point that they’re effectively just two halves of the same database.

So, we’re considering merging them. Does anyone know how we could best perform this merger? We have quite a lot of internal applications that reference one or the other, including many that are customer facing so minimizing downtime would be very important. In order to not have to find and update all of the things hitting these databases, we’re especially interested in some sort of database ‘aliasing’, where an application could be calling a sproc in database ‘A’, and ‘A’ redirects that to the new merged database ‘C’, somehow. Does anyone have any experience with or insight into this type of situation?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T22:15:15+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 10:15 pm

    Here’s an outline of how I’d approach this. This is a totally non-trivial modification, so your mileage will vary depending upon your actual setup.

    (1) Construct the new composite database. I’d take one of the existing two, and add the other’s code into it, rather than create a new (third) database.

    (1a) You’d (presumably) need a routine to build the new database from scratch.

    (1b) You’d (definitely) need a routine to upgrade an existing pair of databases into the single-db form.

    (2) Construct a revised “second” database. Everything in this database is a placeholder, referencing the correlated objects in the revised “first” database. As Tom H. recommends, sysnonyms should work well for this (they’re available in SQL 2005 as well). Views would work as well. Stored procedures should just be wrappers that call their analogs in the (new) first database.

    (3) Test, test test.

    (4) Go back and do step 3 again.

    (5) Apply your changes all at once to existing systems (this is why we have step 4), one environment at a time. Done properly, and depending a lot on your system, you might not even have to adjust how your databases are accessed by users or applications.

    (6) As time and resources allow, revised all outside users and applications to reference the new/single database, ultimately deprecating all usage of or reference to the second database.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 396k
  • Answers 396k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you want something, ask for it. Seriously: you can… May 15, 2026 at 3:03 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Well as far as I understand you looking for this… May 15, 2026 at 3:03 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Try this: Hash = ComputeHash(message) if(!$("#" + Hash).exists()) { var… May 15, 2026 at 3:03 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.