Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8484111
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T20:17:21+00:00 2026-06-10T20:17:21+00:00

Suppose multiple threads execute periodically the DoWork() method below. Suppose that at some point

  • 0

Suppose multiple threads execute periodically the DoWork() method below. Suppose that at some point two threads begin the execution of this method almost simultaneously, so that one of the two local timestamp object is one tick larger than the other.

ICollection collection = // ...

public void DoWork()
{
    DateTime timestamp = DateTime.Now;

    lock(collection.SyncRoot)
    {
        // critical section
    }
}

If the thread A is characterized by a timestamp equal to t1, while the thread B is characterized by a timestamp t2 equal to t1 + 1 tick, then the thread A will require first the access to the critical section.

How does .NET manage the access to the critical section by multiple threads? Does it put access requests in a queue, so that they are in chronological order? In other words, is the access to the critical section guaranteed according to the order of thread access requests?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T20:17:22+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 8:17 pm

    There are absolutely no guarantees on order of threads execution and what thread obtains critical section first.

    Note that even priority of a thread will not guarantee the order – different cores/CPUs can execute threads at different priorities at exactly the same time and any thread can reach and obtain critical section first.

    Note 2: threads also can be scheduled for execution/wait at arbitrary moments of time, so the fact that 2 different operations in the same thread are next to each other does not mean they will be executed one after another without delay in between. In your case it means that thread A may be stopped as soon as it obtains time-stamp and thread B that is scheduled for execution some time later will easily get later time-stamp but gets to critical section first.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I have singleton class that acts as a data cache. Multiple threads will
Suppose we have a map that is shared between multiple threads. It represents a
Suppose I'm accessing a DataTable from multiple threads. If I want to access a
Suppose I create a Windows Azure application that consists of multiple instances talking to
I have multiple Facebook like boxes in one page. Suppose, I have two dives
Suppose I have a custom collection class that provides some internal thread synchronization. For
I'm learning C. I'm writing an application with multiple threads; I know that when
Before I begin, I have to apologize for two things. One is that it
I have a Java JDBC application that uses multiple threads to retrieve information from
When I run multiple threads I get lost in System.out.println output because I suppose

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.