Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 280719
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T05:08:33+00:00 2026-05-12T05:08:33+00:00

Surely the fact that they’re declared beginning with <asp: is enough to infer they’re

  • 0

Surely the fact that they’re declared beginning with “<asp:” is enough to infer they’re server controls? Or is it just included for completeness (so they look similar to the server control declaration of <input runat=”server” for example). Or is there some special reason?

It just always bugs me that the compiler tells me I’ve missed it off when I do so accidentally. Kind of like the thinking behind “var” – if the compiler knows what it is.. why bother expecting me to state it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T05:08:33+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:08 am

    Taken from this forum thread:

    Internet Explorer supports DHTML
    behaviors.

    [The asp:control syntax] does not mean server
    control. You can create client DHTML
    component that has namespace and will
    run on the client machine. Also,
    namespaces are allowed in XHTML and
    techically you can use asp namespace
    for something else on a client, if you
    wish. Runat=”server” prevents
    namespace clash. If element has no
    runat=”server” attribute, it will be
    sent to the client browser unchanged.
    Therefore, you can use HTML components
    (HTCs) in ASP.NET pages as well.

    Have a look here

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/behaviors/howto/creating.asp
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/behaviors/overview.asp

    Mike Schinkel also has a blog post exploring why runat=server is necessary.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In Classic ASP, I loved the fact that I could write out variables, formulas,
I am writing an app that displays fun-facts (and the source they are from).
2/22/2012 3:30:00 Surely that is an acceptable format to be converted to DateTime using
I understand that there are big differences in data-store, but surely since django is
I have a list of dataframes for which I am certain that they all
Surely there is a setting somewhere that can stop the stupid UAC issues blocking
I think that the terminology used in Qt with model/view controls is flawed. On
Just what good is a tool for building business systems that provdes alot of
Surely an ordered set is a more-specific case of a set, so why does
Surely you are familiar with UML class diagrams and object diagrams and their relationships.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.