Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 321101
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T08:48:52+00:00 2026-05-12T08:48:52+00:00

Symptons I have a newly created patch. It installs over the RTM installation without

  • 0

Symptons

I have a newly created patch. It installs over the RTM installation without problems. But it displays the following message, “This installation may require additional dependencies. Without its dependencies, [My App] may not work correctly. Would you like to find the original [My App.exe]?”

Since my original setup is a single file .exe (web setup), this is kind of an annoying and scary message to present to the end user. The user may not even have saved the original setup program or know where to find it again.

Details

My original web installer actually installs installs a complete copy of the extracted MSI file into “[PathToCurrentUser]\Local Settings\Application Data\Downloaded Installation{Some GUID}\”. But the patch looks for the exe file, not the MSI file.

Is there any way, either through the original web installer (I haven’t released it to the public yet) or through the patch to instruct the patching process to find the extracted MSI and not the EXE?

If I can’t get rid of the dire warning message I might opt to release full MSIs rather than partial patches to provide a better user experience.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T08:48:52+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 8:48 am

    This is part of InstallShield’s feature prerequisite support, and it’s looking for the bootstrap setup.exe. You can disable this by changing the condition on the ISInstallPrerequsites action in the Install UI Sequence, and you should be able to do this in either the base image or the upgraded image, just so long as it’s modified by the time the patch is installing. More recent versions of InstallShield have started using the following condition:

    NOT(EXECUTEMODE~="NONE") AND NOT(PATCH AND Installed)

    (Sorry for the late answer; I happened across this post when searching for the answer to a related problem, and hope this is still useful for you.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 165k
  • Answers 165k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Categories extend the original class, but they don't subclass it,… May 12, 2026 at 12:54 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Haven't tested this, but it's something like: RewriteRule \.php$ -… May 12, 2026 at 12:54 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer "0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1" is the IPv6 loopback address as defined in RFC… May 12, 2026 at 12:54 pm

Related Questions

Symptoms I have newly created setup package (MSI) that installs a new version of
I have some code that creates a new site in SharePoint. Upon browsing to
I have a VS 2005 C++ project with both Debug and Release builds. I've
I have a Linq to SQL query that was working just fine with SQL
When you create an instance of the cachefactory and then don’t use it anymore

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.