Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 157481
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T10:30:43+00:00 2026-05-11T10:30:43+00:00

Table has about 8 million rows. There is a non-unique index for X. Showing

  • 0

Table has about 8 million rows. There is a non-unique index for X.

Showing indexes, it shows that in the table there is a non-unique index on key name X with ‘seq_in_index’ of 1, collation A, cardinality 7850780, sub_part NULL, packed NULL, index_type BTREE.

Still, this query can take 5 seconds to run. The list of ints comes from another system, and I am not allowed to store them in a table, because they represent friendships on a social network.

Is there a faster way than a massive IN statement?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T10:30:43+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:30 am

    You can convert your list of IDs into a temp-table (or table-var if MySql supports them) and join with it.

    The table would only live as long as the query so you’re not actually storing anything in a table.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a table with about 35 million rows. each has about 35 integer
I have to delete about 10K rows from a table that has more than
i have a table on SQL Server with about 1 million rows. It has
I have a database table, UserRewards that has 30+ million rows. In this row,
I am running a query on a table that has over 5 million rows
I have a table that has about 1/2 million records in it. Each month
Imagine a table that has two fields, a smalltimedate and an int and about
I have two tables. Table 1 has about 80 rows and Table 2 has
I have a very large table in oracle that contains 140+ million rows. Currently
We have an Oracle database, and the customer account table has about a million

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.