Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7991785
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T13:23:28+00:00 2026-06-04T13:23:28+00:00

Take the following code (Rails 3.0.10): User < AR has_many :providers Provider < AR

  • 0

Take the following code (Rails 3.0.10):

User < AR
  has_many :providers

Provider < AR
  belongs_to :user
  validates_presence_of :user

user = User.new
user.providers.build
# so both models not yet saved but associated with each other

user.valid?
=> false

user.errors
=> {:providers=>["is invalid"]}

user.providers.first.errors
=> {:user_id=>["can't be blank"]}

Why can’t Provider see that it has a not yet saved associated user model available? Or in other words – how can I deal with that so that the validation is still present? Or maybe I’m doing something wrong?

Note, that I’m looking for a clean solution, so suggesting a before validation callback in Provider model saving the User model to the database is a no-go.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T13:23:29+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 1:23 pm

    Use :inverse_of

    class User < ActiveRecord::Base
      has_many :providers, :inverse_of => :user
    end
    
    class Provider < ActiveRecord::Base
      belongs_to :user, :inverse_of => :providers
      validates :user, :presence => true
    end
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Take the following code: ImageView imageView = new ImageView(activity); imageView.setLayoutParams(new RelativeLayout.LayoutParams(LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT, LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT)); Running this
The following code is not working correctly. I would like to take the following
Take the following code: var first = new Date(2011-09-17T15:12:04.331Z); var second = new Date(2011-09-17T19:55:19.269Z);
Take the following code snippet: SPAttachmentCollection attachments = item.Attachments ; What exactly is SPAttachmentCollection
Take the following code: <abbr title=World Health Organization>WHO</abbr> Can we style an abbr tag's
Take the following code: public static string ReverseIt(string myString) { char[] foo = myString.ToCharArray();
Okay so i have a semi weridish problem with re.sub. Take the following code:
Take the following C code as an example: char buffer1[5]; int* ret; printf(Buffer1 is:
Take the following lines of code that would work fine in a c# asp.net
Take a look that the following code snippet: A a = null try {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.