Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3489384
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T11:23:21+00:00 2026-05-18T11:23:21+00:00

Take the following example: class BookManager { … }; class Book { public: void

  • 0

Take the following example:

class BookManager
   {
   ...
   };

class Book
   {
   public:
      void setBookManager(BookManager *bookManager) {m_bookManager = bookManager;}
   private:
      BookManager *m_bookManager;
   };

Since the caller is typically not interested in keeping a BookManager for a Book if the Book is deleted, and since multiple Books can share a BookManager, I make the pointer to BookManager, a shared pointer, like this:

typedef std::shared_ptr<BookManager> BookManagerPtr;

class Book
   {
   public:
      void setBookManager(BookManagerPtr bookManager) {m_bookManager = bookManager;}
   private:
      BookManagerPtr m_bookManager;
   };

Problem is that a module in my application has its own BookManager that it wants to give to each of its books, like this:

class MyModule
   {
   public:
      Book *createBook()
         {
         Book *newBook = new Book();
         newBook->setBookManager(BookManagerPtr(&m_bookManager));
         }
   private:
      BookManager m_bookManager;
   };

Of course this doesn’t work because the last deleted book will also delete the BookManager instance, which it shouldn’t delete because it’s a normal data member of MyModule.

This means that MyModule should also use a shared pointer to BookManager, like this:

class MyModule
   {
   public:
      MyModule()
      : m_bookManager(new BookManager())
         {
         }
      Book *createBook()
         {
         Book *newBook = new Book();
         newBook->setBookManager(m_bookManager);
         }
   private:
      BookManagerPtr m_bookManager;
   };

Is this the only way to solve this?
Or is there a way to still have normal data members and use shared pointers to it (e.g. by initializing its reference count to 1)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T11:23:22+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 11:23 am

    create a copy BookManagerPtr(new BookMarkManager(m_bookManager)), make m_bookManager a BookManagerPtr too or make book a template thus allowing it to use BookManager* and shared_ptr.
    shared_ptr is about shared ownership, in your example MyModule owns the example and book don’t, so it’s not compatible with shared_ptr

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Take the following generics example import java.util.List; import java.util.ArrayList; public class GenericsTest { private
Take the following class as an example: class Sometype { int someValue; public Sometype(int
Take the following useless program: class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { IUnityContainer
Take the following code for example; if (Convert.ToString(frm.WindowState) == Minimized) Layout.WindowState = Maximized; else
Take the following string as an example: The quick brown fox Right now the
Take the following C# class: c1 { event EventHandler someEvent; } If there are
Take the following example (created purely to demonstrate the point). What I am trying
Take the following snippet: List<int> distances = new List<int>(); Was the redundancy intended by
Take the following two lines of code: for (int i = 0; i <
Take the following function: DataTable go() { return someTableAdapter.getSomeData(); } When I set a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.