Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 646113
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T21:34:34+00:00 2026-05-13T21:34:34+00:00

Take the following snippet: 1 #include <stdio.h> 2 #include <stdlib.h> 3 int foo(char [6]);

  • 0

Take the following snippet:

 1  #include <stdio.h>
 2  #include <stdlib.h>
 3  int foo(char [6]);
 4
 5  int main(void) {
 6          char* bar="hello";
 7          return foo(bar);
 8  }
 9
10  int foo(char f[6]) {
11          return EXIT_SUCCESS;
12  }
13

What is the right technical term for “char [6]” on line 3? I call it “type and size specifier” which merely describes what its used for by the compiler.

The entire line 3 I use to call “call stack signature of the function” or simply “function signature”. “function declaration” or “function prototype” would also be correct, as opposed to “function implementation”.

Note: You don’t need to explain me everything about call stacks, frames, calling conventions et. al. I’m only looking for the right terminology there. NOT the entire line 3, only how to call one single specifier, like “char [6]”.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T21:34:34+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:34 pm

    In the C standard (ISO 9899:1999), this is a parameter type specifier and, if there is no identifier in that specifier, the parameter is said to be unnamed.

    Any notion of “size” is part of the type (an array type with unknown size is said to be incomplete). Note that here, the [6] construction does not define an array type but a pointer type (top-level array declarators within parameter lists are automatically converted to pointer declarators, and the putative array size is ignored).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.