Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1092911
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T23:45:09+00:00 2026-05-16T23:45:09+00:00

Task: Design a class that is a collection of other objects and could be

  • 0

Task:

Design a class that is a collection of other objects and could be used in for each (..)

public class Cards
{
    public function add( $Card : Card ) { ... }
}

//...

var $Cards:Cards = new Cards();
//...
for each ( var $Card:Card in $Cards) {
    // do things
}

My first attemt was to use Array class as parent:

public class Cards extends Array { ... }

This works great but Cards class inherits lots of Array‘s public methods that shouldn’t be visible in Cards objects like sort(), push(), forEach(), etc

Second attempt was to define base class as dynamic:

public dynamic class Cards { ... }

This works, but in this case I should define every child class as dynamic too:

public dynamic class Cards { ... }
...
var $Cards:Cards = new Cards();
$Cards.add( new Card() ); // works well

but

public class Player_Cards extends Cards { ... }
...
var $PlayerCards:Cards = new Player_Cards();
$PlayerCards.add( new Card() ); // error, Player_Class should be defined as dynamic too   

Interesting thing is that if I use Array class as parent I shouldn’t define child classes as dynamic

So, the question is:
Is it possible to design a collection class in AS3 that could be used in for each (…) and will not contain any unnessary methods (like from Array class)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T23:45:10+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 11:45 pm

    You can do this extending the Proxy class.

    Check this question for some pointers on how to do this.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.