template <typename Type>
class Foo
{
Foo& Bar()
{
return *this;
}
};
Why does this compile? Shouldn’t I have to specify the template parameter in the return type?
Foo<Type>& Bar()
{
return *this;
}
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Foo<Type>is implied because the definition ofBaris within the definition of the class. If it were outside the class definition then you’d have to define it explicitly: