than higher level languages such as Java C#…
is this argument valid? I’m new to iPhone development and some people have told me this.
than higher level languages such as Java C#… is this argument valid? I’m new
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
than higher level languages such as Java C#…
is this argument valid? I’m new to iPhone development and some people have told me this.
You’re asking whether you get a better idea of car mechanics if you drive a manual transmission rather than a automatic – you’ll kind of get a bit more of a feel what the engine is doing, and you’ll get a horrible grinding mess if you do it wrong, but you won’t get any deep understanding of what is ‘under the hood’ from either.
The semantics of the C language, of which objective-C is a superset, echoes the architecture of the machine it was created for – the PDP-11.
If you look at modern computer architectures – shared instruction and data memory, virtual memory, L1 and L2 cache, bus speed limits, ‘north’ and ‘south’ bridges, multi-core or many-core CPU, solid state disk, graphics processor, FPGA accelerators – then there isn’t one language which has semantics which echo all of the variants, nor does the C language have anything to do with them. The best place to learn about computer architecture is a computer architecture text book or lecture, or read about how modern architecture effects programs in all languages.
C will give you a portable assembler, so represents a couple of steps away from the architecture – it assumes you have pointers (which may be implemented as addresses) to areas you can store data, and it has keywords which imply that data may change (volatile) and that the CPU has registers rather than being stack based. But it won’t really tell you that much about the architecture of your machine, it will only tell you about the C memory model, which is an abstraction of the machines of 40 years ago.