Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3433488
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T07:34:48+00:00 2026-05-18T07:34:48+00:00

thanks to Nick Craver I’ve got a nice toggle menu going, however i’ve come

  • 0

thanks to Nick Craver I’ve got a nice toggle menu going, however i’ve come up with the problem that if users keep clicking new menus the page will keep growing which i dont want, so the idea is:

as one menu opens, any currently open menus to close.

The full source is @ http://the-dot.co.uk/new/

here are 2 snippets of the code I’m using.

<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
$("ul li a").click(function() { $(this).parent().next().toggle("fast"); });
});
</script>

and html structure is

 <ul class="navigation">
    <li><a name="us" title="us">Us</a></li>
    <li id="us">about thedot</li>
    <li><a name="portfolio" title="portfolio">Portfolio</a></li>
    <li></li>
    <li><a name="contact" title="contact">Contact</a></li>
    <li id="contact">contact deets
    </li>
    <li><a name="twitter" title="twitter">Twitter</a></li>
    <li id="twit">some twitter shit</li>
    <li><a href="#">Blog</a></li>
  </ul>

thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T07:34:48+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 7:34 am

    You can do something like this:

    $(function() {
      $("ul li a").click(function() { 
          $(this).parent().next().toggle("fast").siblings("[id]").hide("fast");
      });
    });
    

    You can test it out here, what this does it toggle the sibling <li> still, but then looks at its .siblings() that have an ID attribute and .hide() them if show.


    If the markup isn’t locked in, you could simplify it further like this:

    <ul class="navigation">
        <li class="toggle">Us</li>
        <li class="content">about thedot</li>
        <li class="toggle">Portfolio</li>
        <li class="content"></li>
        <li class="toggle">Contact</li>
        <li class="content">contact deets</li>
        <li class="toggle">Twitter</li>
        <li class="content">some twitter shit</li>
        <li><a href="#">Blog</a></li>
    </ul>
    

    And script like this:

    $(function() {
      $("li.content").hide();
      $("ul.navigation").delegate("li.toggle", "click", function() { 
          $(this).next().toggle("fast").siblings(".content").hide("fast");
      });
    });
    

    It’s a matter of preference, but I find this approach a bit cleaner and more style-able, check out the result here.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Thanks to a library upgrade (easymock 2.2 -> 2.4), we're having tests that have
Thanks to a Q&A on stackoverflow. I just found out how to determine the
Thanks for reading. I'm a bit new to jQuery, and am trying to make
Thanks for answers,Actually I am not puzzled about draw 1024*768 pixels is slower than
Thanks for reading this. I am dynamically generating some data which includes a select
Thanks for a solution in C , now I would like to achieve this
thanks in advance for your help. I am wondering if there is a (design)
Thanks to ASP.NET MVC framework, it became possible to unit test web applications. But
Thanks for reading this. I have markup similar to what is below. Using the
Thanks for reading this I thought I could use find(), but couldn't make it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.