Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 285521
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T05:33:14+00:00 2026-05-12T05:33:14+00:00

That’s what I wanna achieve : There will be dll which contains only methods

  • 0

That’s what I wanna achieve :

There will be dll which contains only methods which calls my actual methods from my application and I can share that dll with outside world regardless of which methods it includes because actual methods will be in the dll in my application but if some one uses that outside dll he/she can manages to get my application to do something in limits of I desire.

I hope I could describe what I want. I don’t know if you have ever used Skype4COM.dll. It actually works like that, it somehow connects to Skype Client and let me call some one I want. For example :

Skype s = new Skype();
s.PlaceCall("phoneNumber");

I import Skype4COM dll in my project and when i write code like above in C#, it connects to Skype and make a call.

I think there is no actual methods which makes calls in Skype4Com.dll. I think it only does have some sort of methods which reach actual methods in Skype API and make the call so whatever the developers change in Skype, it doesn’t affect Skype4Com.dll wrapper as long as signature stays the same.

So, that’s what I want to achive, I am not quite interested in writing wrappers tho, that was a sample case, I want to write a dll which reachs my API and uses method signatures and let people use the application from outside so as long as the signatures stay same, if I want to change something between block I don’t need to change the dll given out to outside..

Thank in advance….

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T05:33:14+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:33 am

    If I understand you correctly, you want to expose a limited subset of the functions of your application to outside users. In effect, you want to offer a service, but nothing else.

    Then you should use Windows Communication Foundation to host a service inside of your application (or elsewhere). This service could use industry-standard protocols like SOAP; or could use REST; or it could use faster binary transfers over TCP/IP for your .NET clients.

    It’s perfect for a service-oriented situation like yours.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

That's the question. Give only one reason you think why have OODB failed or
That's basically the question, is there a right way to implement operator<< ? Reading
I have text I am displaying in SIlverlight that is coming from a CMS
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
That's about DirectX 9. In typical case of rendering with vertex shader, there's one
That is, will calling the following target when testSetupDone evaluates to false, execute the
That is, I'd like to have a tuple of values. The use case on
That's it. If you want to document a function or a class, you put
That's it. It's a dumb dumb (embarrassing!) question, but I've never used C# before,
that one has been nagging me ever since I dabbled in web developpement; is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.