Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 106473
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T01:36:08+00:00 2026-05-11T01:36:08+00:00

The application de-serializes a stream into dynamically allocated objects and then keeps base type

  • 0

The application de-serializes a stream into dynamically allocated objects and then keeps base type pointers in a linked list (i.e. abstract factory). It’s too slow. Profiling says all the time is spent in operator new.

Notes: The application already uses a custom memory allocator that does pooling. The compiler is VC++ 6.0 and the code uses the old RogueWave collections rather than the STL.

The only idea I have right now is to introduce Object Pooling. I’d maintain large collections of pre-allocated objects for each type and re-use them. But this will be a lot of work in this old code, and I’m not yet sure there’s enough re-use that it would even help. I was hoping someone smarter than me has an idea.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T01:36:08+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:36 am

    The only way is to reduce the number of memory allocations. Have you used a profiler that will tell you exactly what is doing the allocation? Are you possibly doing some string manipulation?
    If all the time is spent allocating the objects the factory is creating, you may need to go to a pool.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 215k
  • Answers 215k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer On PostBack you need to explicitly regenerate the buttons from… May 12, 2026 at 11:00 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Hibernate "nicely wraps" only what you tell it to wrap.… May 12, 2026 at 11:00 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm pretty sure you want the WMI perf classes Win32_PerfFormattedData_PerfProc_Process… May 12, 2026 at 11:00 pm

Related Questions

I am working on a project right now that involves receiving a message from
Are there any compatibility issues to take care of when serailizing an object in
I have a project and I want to strong name the executable file. Using
I am having some serious trouble creating a WPF TreeView with an Object databinding.

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.