Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9230833
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T05:54:58+00:00 2026-06-18T05:54:58+00:00

The Background: I have an application that needs to run on clients whose installed

  • 0

The Background:

I have an application that needs to run on clients whose installed .NET frameworks range all the way from 2.0 up to 4.5. This application has to be able to enumerate and perform operations on large numbers of files (in excess of 200k discrete files, in select cases).

To build the index of files, the application currently uses System.IO.DirectoryInfo.GetFiles(). This comes at a performance hit, as the processing component has to wait for the entirety of the Path tree to be indexed before it can start work. Due to some archaic tape multiloaders and some poorly written firmware, traversing some directories can trigger reads from tapes – jacking the processing time from tens of seconds to tens of minutes.

.NET 4.0 provides the System.IO.Directory.EnumerateFiles(Path) method, which alleviates this problem. However, only a few of the datter consoles have been upgraded to 4.0+, and our pleas to modernize have been met with hostility.

The Question:

Is it possible to implement methods for both GetFiles and EnumerateFiles in a single binary? Effectively, this would be a single binary targeted to .NET 2.0, with the ability to call a .NET 4.0 method if it was determined at runtime that the 4.0 framework was available.

Before it’s mentioned: changing out the datters is not an option to our client. I’ve tried. Have I ever tried.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T05:54:59+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 5:54 am

    You won’t be able to (easily) make a single binary that works on .NET 2.0 and uses the .NET 4.0 methods. There are all kinds of roundabout ways – reflection etc., but those seem like a bad idea in your case.

    However, there’s no reason why you can’t make your own implementation for EnumerateFiles in a .NET 2.0 library. For this you’d make P/Invoke calls to the WIN32 functions FindFirstFile and FindNextFile. Two CodeProject projects look like they cover this area, and should have the right bits in the source:

    • http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/12782/File-System-Enumerator-using-lazy-matching
    • http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/38959/A-Faster-Directory-Enumerator
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have constructed a Swing Application that needs to be run from a browser.
Background: I have an application that, when installed, generates a random identifier (AppId). When
I have a Java application that run as a background service, i.e. no GUI.
I have a .net console application that I wrote that is being run in
I have a GUI application that needs to run long calculations (think a minute
Background I've written a small C#/.NET 4.0 application that syncs various settings from a
I have an application that needs to wait for a background worker to finish
I have an application that runs on background because it's needs to use Location
I need to have ALWAYS a background service that will synchronize my Android application
Some background: we have a windows application (c#) that locate in the system try.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.