Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1110695
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T02:26:01+00:00 2026-05-17T02:26:01+00:00

The better way to ask this question would be an example as follows What

  • 0

The better way to ask this question would be an example as follows
What are the pros and cons of the 2 approaches? Is one always better than the other or under specific circumstances? If using Approach1, using an interface would be moot right? since anyone can access the public methods anyway?

public interface IDoSomething
{
  void Method1(string operation, User user, string category)
  void Method2(string operation, User user)
  void Method3(string operation)
}

//Approach1
Class A: IDoSomething
{                              
  public void Method1(string operation, User user, string category)
  {
   //do some db logic here...
  }

  public void Method2(string operation, User user)
  {
    Method1(operation, user, "General");
  }

  public void Method3(string operation)
  {
    Method1(operation, User.GetDefaultUser(), "General");
  }
}

OR

//Approach2
Class A: IDoSomething
{                              
  void IDoSomething.Method1(string operation, User user, string category)
  {
   //do some logic here...
  }

  void IDoSomething.Method2(string operation, User user)
  {
    (this as IDoSomething).Method1(operation, user, "General");
  }

  void IDoSomething.Method3(string operation)
  {
    (this as IDoSomething).Method1(operation, User.GetDefaultUser(), "General");
  }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T02:26:02+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 2:26 am

    The phrase you’re looking for to describe the second approach is explicit interface implementation. Personally, I wouldn’t use it most of the time. It’s useful it you need to implement different interfaces with the same member signature in different ways, or if you want to restrict some members to only be visible when dealing with an expression of the interface type… but it can be a pain if for whatever reason your caller has the concrete type, and needs to call some type-specific methods and some interface methods. You can’t even see explicitly implemented methods within the same class without casting this to the interface type.

    Explicit interface implementation also means that you can’t override the interface methods – you’d have to reimplement the interface within any subclasses. Basically it ends up being quite complicated – so I’d avoid it if possible.

    One final note: explicit interface implementation also plays badly with dynamic in C# 4.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I thought I would ask this question to see why many examples and people
I'd better ask the question by example. Let's say I have UserControl and Window
I'm not sure if this is the best way to ask this question but
I'm not sure of the best way to ask this question, so I'll start
I think the best way to form this question is with an example...so, the
any better way to write this ? $(this).parent().parent().find( dd ul).toggle(); update.. I am trying
Is there a better way to code this? def __contains__(self, e): return e in
Is there a better way to write this spec? This works but I don't
Is there a better way to format data uniformly than to store data as
Is there any other better way to fill up the array like : var

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.