Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4171910
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T00:30:00+00:00 2026-05-21T00:30:00+00:00

The C99 standard defines ldexp(double a, int exp) as a × 2 exp and

  • 0

The C99 standard defines ldexp(double a, int exp) as a × 2exp and scalbn(double a, int exp) as a × FLT_RADIXexp

What’s the difference between the two if I’m using IEEE-754 arithmetic (i.e. FLT_RADIX == 2)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T00:30:01+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 12:30 am

    Appendix F:

            F.9.3.6  The ldexp functions
    
           [#1] On a binary system, ldexp(x, exp) is equivalent to
    
                   scalbn(x, exp)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I read in the c99 Standard: -remove implicit function declaration, -remove implicit int. But
Does it make any difference in C99 when one writes const int x =
C99 standard has integer types with bytes size like int64_t. I am using Windows's
Thankfully, the complex type modifier was introduced into C99 standard. What I don't understand
So, poking through the n869 draft of the C99 standard I stumbled across this
All operations on standard signed integer types in C (short, int, long, etc) exhibit
Background Unfortunately the current C++ standard lacks C99's exact-width types defined in the stdint
Is there anything in the C standard (I guess at the moment that's C99
The C99 standard says: The number of characters that can be produced by any
The C99 standard document has the following example in the section related to the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.