Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3407706
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T05:47:02+00:00 2026-05-18T05:47:02+00:00

The camel book suggests that V-strings can be used for representing IPv4 addresses: $ipaddr

  • 0

The camel book suggests that V-strings can be used for representing IPv4 addresses:

$ipaddr = 204.148.40.9;   # the IPv4 address of oreilly.com

But perldata on the topic of Version Strings states:

Note that using the v-strings for IPv4
addresses is not portable unless you
also use the inet_aton()/inet_ntoa()
routines of the Socket package.

I have two questions:

1) Why is using the v-strings not portable?
2) What’s the “standard” way to convert an ip-address from dotted notation to integer? Seems that unpack "N", <v-string> can cause problems sometimes.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T05:47:03+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 5:47 am

    The “standard” way to get the encoded form is inet_aton, which handles dotted IP addresses as well as hostnames — but what do you need it for? More often than not the best idea is just to skip all of the low-level interfaces that deal with such things and use, e.g., IO::Socket.

    If you’re looking to convert to integer, as you say, and not to the form that socket functions expect (they’re similar concepts in C, but less so in Perl), then you can go ahead and use pack just fine as long as you’re consistent — the part that’s unportable is the format that socket functions accept. For example, unpack "N", pack "C4", split /\./, "1.2.3.4" will get you a nice unsigned big-endian representation of that address (in the form of the number 16909060 == 0x01020304).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I came across this line in a book on WCF: ...and the languages used
I'm new to Python and am reading a book that came out in 2009
I am reading a C book that deals a lot with asm and looking
I currently work on a trading application that does not use camel. It essentially
I'm reading 'the art of prolog' book and I found an exercise that reads
I have a fairly basic question. I am going through the camel book 6th
I was reading Django Book and came across interesting statement. Notice that Django doesn’t
This is the code that i came up with while solving a book problem
In Kathy Sierra's book on SCJP we learn that, When we write List <A>
I have read O'Reilly book, in that I came to know this get-put principle

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.