Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7815627
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T05:34:44+00:00 2026-06-02T05:34:44+00:00

The codebase I’m working on was recently upgraded from Ruby 1.9.2 to Ruby 1.9.3

  • 0

The codebase I’m working on was recently upgraded from Ruby 1.9.2 to Ruby 1.9.3 and from Rails 3.1 to Rails 3.2.2. Since I’m using RVM I simply did rvm install 1.9.3 which I would have expected to be all that was necessary.

When I run

rails s

I get the error

[BUG] cross-thread violation on rb_gc()

I’ve found a number of links relating to this problem. There is one on StackOverflow, but it doesn’t really give an answer. The most promising answer is on the RVM site:

In every case of this I have seen thus far it has always ended up
being that a ruby gem/library with C extensions was compiled against a
different ruby and/or architecture than the one that is trying to load
it. Try uninstalling & reinstalling gems with C extensions that your
application uses to hunt this buggar down.

That’s fairly helpful, but my Ruby-fu is not strong enough to know which gems have C extensions and which ones I should try to re-install. Quite a few of the other links on the topic seem to suggest that the json gem is at fault, so I tried following the suggested solution.

gem uninstall json 
gem install --platform=ruby

This didn’t really change anything for me—I still get the exact same error when trying to start the Rails environment.

How do I track down this problem?

If it helps, here is the output from gem list:

actionmailer (3.2.2)
actionpack (3.2.2)
activemodel (3.2.2)
activerecord (3.2.2)
activeresource (3.2.2)
activesupport (3.2.2)
addressable (2.2.7)
akami (1.0.0)
arel (3.0.2)
bcrypt-ruby (3.0.1)
bson (1.6.1)
bson_ext (1.6.1)
builder (3.0.0)
bundler (1.1.3, 1.0.21)
capybara (1.1.2)
carmen (0.2.13)
childprocess (0.3.1)
ci_reporter (1.7.0)
coderay (1.0.5)
coffee-rails (3.2.2)
coffee-script (2.2.0)
coffee-script-source (1.2.0)
commonjs (0.2.5)
cucumber (1.1.9)
cucumber-rails (1.3.0)
database_cleaner (0.7.2)
devise (2.0.4)
diff-lcs (1.1.3)
ejs (1.0.0)
email_spec (1.2.1)
engineyard (1.4.28)
engineyard-serverside-adapter (1.6.3)
erubis (2.7.0)
escape (0.0.4)
execjs (1.3.0)
factory_girl (3.0.0)
factory_girl_rails (3.0.0)
faker (1.0.1)
fakeweb (1.3.0)
ffi (1.0.11)
gherkin (2.9.3)
gyoku (0.4.4)
haml (3.1.4)
haml-rails (0.3.4)
hash-deep-merge (0.1.1)
highline (1.6.11)
hike (1.2.1)
httpi (0.9.6)
i18n (0.6.0)
jasmine (1.1.2)
jasmine-core (1.1.0)
jasminerice (0.0.8)
journey (1.0.3)
jquery-rails (2.0.1)
json (1.6.6)
json_pure (1.6.6)
kaminari (0.13.0)
kgio (2.7.4)
launchy (2.0.5)
less (2.1.0)
less-rails (2.2.0)
libv8 (3.3.10.4 x86_64-darwin-11)
log4r (1.1.10)
mail (2.4.4)
metaclass (0.0.1)
method_source (0.7.1)
mime-types (1.18)
mocha (0.10.5)
mongo (1.6.1)
mongoid (2.4.7)
mongoid-rspec (1.4.4)
multi_json (1.2.0)
net-ssh (2.2.2)
newrelic_rpm (3.3.3)
nokogiri (1.5.2)
nori (1.1.0)
open4 (1.3.0)
orm_adapter (0.0.7)
polyglot (0.3.3)
pr_geohash (1.0.0)
pry (0.9.8.4)
pry-highlight (0.0.1)
pry_debug (0.0.1)
rack (1.4.1)
rack-cache (1.2)
rack-ssl (1.3.2)
rack-test (0.6.1)
rails (3.2.2)
rails-footnotes (3.7.6)
railties (3.2.2)
raindrops (0.8.0)
rake (0.9.2.2)
rdoc (3.12)
recursive-open-struct (0.2.1)
rest-client (1.6.7)
rpm_contrib (2.1.8)
rsolr (1.0.7)
rspec (2.9.0)
rspec-core (2.9.0)
rspec-expectations (2.9.0)
rspec-mocks (2.9.0)
rspec-rails (2.9.0)
rubyzip (0.9.6.1)
sass (3.1.15)
sass-rails (3.2.5)
savon (0.9.9)
selenium-webdriver (2.20.0)
settings-tree (0.2.1)
simplecov (0.6.1)
simplecov-html (0.5.3)
simplecov-rcov (0.2.3)
slop (2.4.4)
spine-rails (0.1.0)
spork (1.0.0rc2)
sprockets (2.1.2)
sunspot (1.3.1)
sunspot_mongoid (0.4.1)
sunspot_rails (1.3.1)
sunspot_solr (1.3.1)
term-ansicolor (1.0.7)
therubyracer (0.10.1)
thor (0.14.6)
tilt (1.3.3)
treetop (1.4.10)
twitter-bootstrap-rails (2.0.6)
tzinfo (0.3.32)
uglifier (1.2.4)
unicorn (4.2.1)
warden (1.1.1)
wasabi (2.1.0)
xpath (0.1.4)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T05:34:46+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 5:34 am

    Here are various approaches you can try.

    cleanup

    To clean up old versions of your gems:

    gem cleanup --dryrun
    

    json

    To temporarily see if the json gem is the issue, switch from json (native) to json (pure ruby) and change your Gemfile:

    gem install json_pure 
    

    native gems

    Your gem list has a few that pop out for me as native:

    • bcrypt
    • bson
    • erubis
    • ffi (enables lots of native connections)
    • gherkin
    • kgio
    • less
    • nokogiri
    • raindrops
    • therubyracer (many unpredictable issues IMHO)
    • unicorn

    ffi

    Your gem ffi is especially interesting — do you happen to know what you’re doing with it?

    The ffi enables Ruby code to call native code, for example if some part of your Ruby app needs to connect to native libraries.

    When you’re diagnosing your issue, I’d look at this gem first.

    makefiles

    To find any of your gems that have Makefile files, which is a good indicator that they have native code:

    find / | grep "/ruby/gems/" | grep Makefile
    

    To find all your gems so you can delete them:

    find / | grep "/ruby/gems/"
    

    nuke RVM

    To nuke RVM or its pieces, you can use rvm uninstall, rvm implode, or this script which nukes RVM and finds any lingering pieces:

    https://raw.github.com/SixArm/sixarm_unix_shell_scripts/master/rvm-uninstall-danger
    

    try rbenv + bundler

    I changed from using rvm to using rbenv + bundler and it’s working great for me.

    The rbenv tool is a direct competitor to rvm for managing Ruby versions:
    https://github.com/sstephenson/rbenv

    Bundler is a great way to manage gemsets and gem dependencies:
    http://gembundler.com/

    brew

    If you’re on a Mac and using MacPorts, to change to Homebrew:

    Link

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am working with an existing codebase that creates CVD images from a webcam
The rails codebase that I'm working on supports two web applications, and we use
The current codebase I'm working with is very tied to Prototype+scriptaculous. When I look
I have a large codebase which has many, many instances of the try {
I'm migrating a legacy codebase at work from python 2.4 to python 2.6. This
I am working on a codebase that uses php within .html files. How do
In our codebase we are using the following structure, using TFS / - Build
In the legacy codebase that I am working on, there is a condition evaluator
In my codebase I recently came across a design decision made by the team
I'm upgrade a codebase from 1.8 to 1.9. I'm encountering a couple places in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.