Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 734535
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T07:23:04+00:00 2026-05-14T07:23:04+00:00

The default behavior of XML serialization (to_xml) for ActiveRecord objects will emit ‘type’ and

  • 0

The default behavior of XML serialization (to_xml) for ActiveRecord objects will emit ‘type’ and ‘nil’ attributes that are similar to XML Schema Instance attributes, but aren’t set in a XML Namespace.

For example, a model might produce an output like this:

<user>
  <username nil="true" />
  <first-name type="string">Name</first-name>
</user>

Is there anyway to get to_xml to utilize the XML Schema Instance namespace and prefix the attributes and the values?

Using the above example, I’d like to produce the following:

<user xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema">
  <username xsi:nil="true" />
  <first-name xsi:type="xs:string">Name</first-name>
</user>
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T07:23:04+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 7:23 am

    I ran into something similar, but when calling #to_xml on a Hash, not on an AR instance.

    I came up with this helper:

      #
      # Returns a new Builder::XmlMarkup that'll handle API's to_xml needs
      # Usually you don't need to construct a builder, as to_xml will create one
      # however we need some things modified (adding a namespace, XSD-nillable-compliant-nils
      # and to_xml is too braindead to allow us to alter such behaviors externally
      #
      def api_new_xml_builder
        builder = Builder::XmlMarkup.new(:indent => 2)
        class << builder
          def method_missing(*args, &block)
            @api_seen ||= 0
            @api_seen += 1
            if @api_seen == 1
              # Root element. Needs some decoration
              args[1] ||= {}
              args[1]["xmlns"] = "http://my_company.com/api/schemas/xml"
              args[1]["xmlns:xsi"] = "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
            end
            if args[2].is_a?(Hash) && args[2][:nil] == true
              args[2]["xsi:nil"] = true
            end
            super(*args, &block)
          end
        end
        builder
      end
    

    It’s then used like so:

    builder = api_new_xml_builder
    foo.to_xml(:builder => builder)
    

    Note that I opted to keep the existing nil= and type= attributes, and add my own xsi-prefixed nil, however it’s trivial to replace them instead.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 379k
  • Answers 379k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It appears that the console interface of the Ruby application… May 14, 2026 at 9:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The QGraphicsScene::addWidget documentation states that QGLWidget is not a supported… May 14, 2026 at 9:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The files shown are essentially "your files" - so if… May 14, 2026 at 9:36 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.