Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 353785
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T11:51:46+00:00 2026-05-12T11:51:46+00:00

The do function in rebol seems to accept unlimited arguments. Can I do that

  • 0

The do function in rebol seems to accept unlimited arguments. Can I do that with my own function (without using a block of arguments) ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T11:51:46+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 11:51 am

    It is not possible to define a function with a variable number of arguments. The last message in this Rebol Mailing List thread http://www.rebol.org/ml-display-thread.r?m=rmlDTXB has an explanation.

    Also the do function takes a single argument:

    >> ? do
    USAGE:
        DO value /args arg /next 
    
    DESCRIPTION:
         Evaluates a block, file, URL, function, word, or any other value.
         DO is a native value.
    
    ARGUMENTS:
         value -- Normally a file name, URL, or block (Type: any)
    
    REFINEMENTS:
         /args -- If value is a script, this will set its system/script/args
             arg -- Args passed to a script. Normally a string. (Type: any)
         /next -- Do next expression only.  Return block with result and new position.
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 300k
  • Answers 300k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Try: SELECT MAX(column) FROM table; MAX is an aggregate function;… May 13, 2026 at 7:56 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This should work fine: Dim result As DialogResult = MessageBox.Show("message",… May 13, 2026 at 7:56 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I suspect this is because you have console application and… May 13, 2026 at 7:56 pm

Related Questions

I want to create a do-libs generic function to automatically load a bunch of
When executing do-file: func[file][ if error? error: try [ if (find [%.r %.cgi] (suffix?
What is the benefit of declaring the possible exception-throws from a C++ function? In
foreach($arrayOne as $value){ do function } In the above example, I'd like to pass

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.