Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1808624
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T06:17:05+00:00 2026-05-17T06:17:05+00:00

The doctest of the following (nonsense) Python module fails: >>> L = [] >>>

  • 0

The doctest of the following (nonsense) Python module fails:

"""
>>> L = []
>>> if True:
...    append_to(L) # XXX
>>> L
[1]
"""

def append_to(L):
    L.append(1)
    class A(object):
        pass
    return A()

import doctest; doctest.testmod()

This is because the output after the line marked XXX is <__main__.A object at ...> (which is returned by append_to). Of course, I could put this output directly after the line marked XXX but in my case this would distract the reader from what shall be actually tested, namely the side effect of the function append_to. So how can I suppress that output or how can I ignore it. I tried it with:

"""
>>> L = []
>>> if True:
...    append_to(L) # doctest: +ELLIPSIS
    ...
>>> L
[1]
"""

def append_to(L):
    L.append(1)
    class A(object):
        pass
    return A()

import doctest; doctest.testmod()

However, this yields a ValueError: line 4 of the docstring for __main__ has inconsistent leading whitespace: ' ...'.

What I don’t want to do is to change the line append_to(L) to something like _ = append_to(L) which would suppress the output, because the doctest is for documentation purposes and to show the reader how the module is supposed to be used.
(In the case being documented, append_to should be used statement-like and not like a function. Writing _ = append_to(L) would deviate the reader from this.)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T06:17:05+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 6:17 am

    rewrite: This actually does work now; I realized that the “doctest” I had written earlier was actually not being parsed as the module docstring, so the test wasn’t passing: it was just not being run.

    I made sure to double-check this one.

    __doc__ = """
    >>> L = []
    >>> if True:
    ...    append_to(L) # doctest: +IGNORE_RESULT
    >>> L
    [1]
    """.replace('+IGNORE_RESULT', '+ELLIPSIS\n<...>')
    
    def append_to(L):
        L.append(1)
        class A(object):
            pass
        return A()
    

    I’m not sure if this qualifies as more readable or not. Note that there’s nothing special about <...>: it will only work if the actual return value has that form, as it does in this case (i.e. it’s <module.A object at 0x...>). The ELLIPSIS option makes ... “match any substring in the actual output” ¹. So I don’t think there’s a way to get it to match the entirety of the output.

    update: To do this the “proper” way, it looks like you’d want to call doctest.register_optionflag('IGNORE_RESULT'), subclass doctest.OptionChecker, and arrange for an instance of that subclass to be used by the doctest. Presumably this means that running your doctest via $ python -m doctest your_module.py is not an option.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.