Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6881409
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T05:06:13+00:00 2026-05-27T05:06:13+00:00

The Erlang external term format has changed at least once (but this change appears

  • 0

The Erlang external term format has changed at least once (but this change appears to predate the history stored in the Erlang/OTP github repository); clearly, it could change in the future.

However, as a practical matter, is it generally considered safe to assume that this format is stable now? By “stable,” I mean specifically that, for any term T, term_to_binary will return the same binary in any current or future version of Erlang (not merely whether it will return a binary that binary_to_term will convert back to a term identical to T). I’m interested in this property because I’d like to store hashes of arbitrary Erlang terms on disk and I want identical terms to have the same hash value now and in the future.

If it isn’t safe to assume that the term format is stable, what are people using for efficient and stable term serialization?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T05:06:14+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 5:06 am

    it’s been stated that erlang will provide compatibility for at least 2 major releases. that would mean that BEAM files, the distribution protocol, external term format, etc from R14 will at least work up to R16.

    "We have as a strategy to at least support backwards compatibility 2 major releases back in time."

    "In general, we only break backward compatibility in major releases
    and only for a very good reason and usually after first deprecating
    the feature one or two releases beforehand."

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In RPC semantics where Erlang has hope for the best, SUN RPC with at-least
This is an erlang problem, it seems. I have this code to test the
I was reading the erlang documentation about file io and saw this: On operating
I have erlang application. In this application i run process with spawn(?MODULE, my_foo, [my_param1,
I doubt anyone can help with this question because of the following in Erlang's
I have this Erlang code: not lists:any(fun(Condition) ->Condition(Message) end, Conditions). Can anyone please explain
I'd need an Erlang implementation of the OpenId protocol. I found the following, but
As Erlang is an almost pure functional programming language, I'd imagine this was possible:
Erlang obviously has a notion of namespace , we use things like application:start() every
I have Programming Erlang book already and I use http://www.erlang.org/ site. But I can't

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.