Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 169033
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T12:33:32+00:00 2026-05-11T12:33:32+00:00

The find command seems to differ from other Unix commands. Why is there the

  • 0

The find command seems to differ from other Unix commands.

Why is there the empty curly brackets and a backward flash at the end of the following command?

find * -perm 777 -exec chmod 770 {} \; 

I found one reason for the curly brackets but not for the backward flash.

The curly brackets are apparently for the path

Same as -exec, except that “{}” is replaced with as many pathnames as possible for each invocation of utility

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T12:33:32+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 12:33 pm

    I’d recommend that you instead do that as

    find . -perm 777 -print0 | xargs -0 chmod 770 

    ‘xargs’ says to take the results of the find and feed it 20 at a time to the following command.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Unix command find doesn't do what I want to do. Here is the situation
for example i use following command to find a record SELECT `users`.`mail` FROM `users`
Is there any example on DOS Batch - Find and Replace command for files?
What is the practical difference between the following two commands? Command A find .
Is there a command for this? It seems like something really useful that should
I can't seem to find details on how to unsubscribe from ubiquity commands. The
Currently I have a bash script which runs the find command, like so: find
I wonder how to specify to the command find for searching files with names
I wonder how to specify to the command find for searching files under current
I am using the pdist command to find the distance between x and y

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.