Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 139039
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:21:50+00:00 2026-05-11T07:21:50+00:00

The first real software company that I worked at was all about the unit

  • 0

The first real software company that I worked at was all about the unit testing (NUnit). I don’t know that we were real sticklers for it back then — I have no idea what our code coverage was like and I was writing most of the unit tests. Since then I’ve run into some companies that do lots of testing, but it’s chair testing: relies on a person being there, has low repeatibility and low chance of catching bugs. The other attitude is: it was something they wanted to get going with ‘in the future’; basically when money falls from the sky.

I miss unit testing — it just makes life easier. But I’m finding that when I look for a new job, unit testing is either something that companies would like to ‘get going with’ in the future or something they don’t do at all (uhh, it’s been around for a while now!). I’d say that 60-75% of the job reqs I’ve looked at over the past 2 years have not listed unit testing at all. I can only think of one or two that had unit testing experience as a requirement (for a mid-level developer position).

So the question is, what’s missing? I think it makes people more productive, but that’s only after spending a solid amount of time actually doing it. Aren’t there any good studies about the cost savings of unit testing? Is it the type of company I’m looking at?

Edit: even though the title is a bit devils-advocate, I consider myself a unit testing proponent.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:21:51+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:21 am

    In my experience, there are a couple of factors involved in this:

    1. Management doesn’t really understand what unit testing really is, or why it has real intrinsic value to them.
    2. Management tends to be more concerned with rapid product delivery, and (incorrectly) sees unit testing as counterproductive to that goal.
    3. There’s a misperception that testing belongs solely in the pervue of QA. Developers are coders, and can’t write tests.
    4. There’s a common misperception that management will have to spend money to do unit testing correctly, despite the fact that the tools are freely available. (There is, of course, the developer ramp up time to consider, but it’s not really prohibitive.)
    5. Will’s answer will round this answer out: It’s very hard to determine the value of test code (edit jcollum)

    Naturally, there are other factors, but those are just what I’ve run into so far.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 58k
  • Answers 58k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer reduce the problem to its simplest form: you have a… May 11, 2026 at 8:44 am
  • added an answer Behavior by design, per http://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=377495. The memory is reserved, but… May 11, 2026 at 8:44 am
  • added an answer I've been dealing with Japanese encodings for almost 20 years… May 11, 2026 at 8:44 am

Top Members

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.