Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4066066
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T16:05:24+00:00 2026-05-20T16:05:24+00:00

The following code compiles fine. #define CMD_MACRO(pp, cmd) \ { \ if (pp)\ {

  • 0

The following code compiles fine.

#define CMD_MACRO(pp, cmd)  \
{           \
      if (pp)\
      { cmd; }        \
}

template<class T> void operate_on(T &data, char c) {
  data=data+1;
};

int main() {
  int book=4;
  char c;
    CMD_MACRO(book, {
        operate_on<int>(book, c);
    });
};

Note that the actual macro in my code is more complex, I have given a simplified version which may not make much logical sense

Now, if I add another template parameter in the function it gives compilation error (problem explained in code comment):

template<class T, bool b> void operate_on(T &data, char c) {
  data=data+1;
};
int main() {
      int book=4;
      char c;
        CMD_MACRO(book, {
            operate_on<int, false>(book, c); /* here the "," between int and 
                  false is being treated 
                  as separating arguments to CMD_MACRO, 
                  instead being part of 'cmd'. Thats strange 
                  because the comma separating book and c is 
                  treated fine as part of 'cmd'. */
        });
};


test.cpp:18:6: error: macro "CMD_MACRO" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2
test.cpp: In function 'int main()':
test.cpp:16: error: 'CMD_MACRO' was not declared in this scope

How to fix the problem (I need to add that extra template parameter to existing code and am getting such an error).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T16:05:24+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 4:05 pm

    Have you tried: (operate_on<int, false>(book, c));? (Notice the extra parentheses around the expression).

    I believe the preprocessor knows nothing of C++ templates, and so treats the < and > as just any old token. Without the extra parentheses, it treats operate_on<int as one argument, and false>(book, c) as another.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In Microsoft Oslo SDK CTP 2008 (using Intellipad) the following code compiles fine: module
The following code does not compile: public class GenericsTest { public static void main(String[]
In C++ the following code gives a compiler error: void destruct1 (int * item)
The following code compiles correctly under VC++ 8 on XPSP3, but running it causes
Suppose someone (other than me) writes the following code and compiles it into an
The following code doesn't compile with gcc, but does with Visual Studio: template <typename
This following code gets this compile error: " invalid types 'int[int]' for array subscript
I have a C++ class that compiles fine on linux with gcc and on
The following code fails to compile stating A local variable named 'st' cannot be
The following Code does not compile Dim BasicGroups As String() = New String() {Node1,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.