Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6536843
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T10:32:35+00:00 2026-05-25T10:32:35+00:00

The following code compiles: @interface MyClass : ParentClass // missing { // missing }

  • 0

The following code compiles:

@interface MyClass : ParentClass // missing {
// missing }
@property (nonatomic, copy) NSString *myString;
@end

I’m wondering if the curly braces in @interface declarations are actually necessary.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T10:32:36+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 10:32 am

    No, the { } section isn’t necessary; your code will compile fine without it. It’s the area where you declare instance variables, and if you’re not doing that, you’re free to leave it out. You don’t even actually need to declare ivars for your properties—the compiler’s smart enough to add them where they’re needed.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following code: // ClassA.h @interface ClassA : NSObject @property (nonatomic, retain,
The following code compiles correctly under VC++ 8 on XPSP3, but running it causes
The following code compiles in Visual C++ and gcc, but fails with Code Warrior
In Microsoft Oslo SDK CTP 2008 (using Intellipad) the following code compiles fine: module
I have the following code that compiles and works well: template<typename T> T GetGlobal(const
I came across the following code that compiles fine (using Visual Studio 2005): SomeObject
Suppose someone (other than me) writes the following code and compiles it into an
Visual Studio 2008 I am using the following source code that compiles ok using
I have following piece of code: It compiles without problems under gcc-3.4, gcc-4.3, intel
I have the following code, which compiles but doesn't bring back any data. Here

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.