Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8445417
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T09:39:16+00:00 2026-06-10T09:39:16+00:00

The following code doesn’t compile in VS2012 class Zot { public: int A() {

  • 0

The following code doesn’t compile in VS2012

class Zot
{
public:
    int A() { return 123; }
};

int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
    std::function<int (Zot*)> fn = &Zot::A;
    return 0;
}

However, changing the assignment to

    std::function<int (Zot*)> fn = std::bind(&Zot::A, std::placeholders::_1);

Does work.

There are a lot of online examples that show the original syntax. Did something change in the C++11 spec to disallow this syntax?

Is there a valid shorter form for the assignment?

Edit: the compiler error (slightly edited for reabability) is:

1>vc\include\functional(515): error C2664: 'std::_Func_class<_Ret,_V0_t>::_Set' : cannot convert parameter 1 from '_Myimpl *' to 'std::_Func_base<_Rx,_V0_t> *'
1>          with
1>          [
1>              _Ret=int,
1>              _V0_t=Zot *
1>          ]
1>          and
1>          [
1>              _Rx=int,
1>              _V0_t=Zot *
1>          ]
1>          Types pointed to are unrelated; conversion requires reinterpret_cast, C-style cast or function-style cast
1>          vc\include\functional(515) : see reference to function template instantiation 'void std::_Func_class<_Ret,_V0_t>::_Do_alloc<_Myimpl,_Fret(__thiscall Zot::* const &)(void),_Alloc>(_Fty,_Alloc)' being compiled
1>          with
1>          [
1>              _Ret=int,
1>              _V0_t=Zot *,
1>              _Fret=int,
1>              _Alloc=std::allocator<std::_Func_class<int,Zot *>>,
1>              _Fty=int (__thiscall Zot::* const &)(void)
1>          ]
1>          vc\include\functional(515) : see reference to function template instantiation 'void std::_Func_class<_Ret,_V0_t>::_Do_alloc<_Myimpl,_Fret(__thiscall Zot::* const &)(void),_Alloc>(_Fty,_Alloc)' being compiled
1>          with
1>          [
1>              _Ret=int,
1>              _V0_t=Zot *,
1>              _Fret=int,
1>              _Alloc=std::allocator<std::_Func_class<int,Zot *>>,
1>              _Fty=int (__thiscall Zot::* const &)(void)
1>          ]
1>          vc\include\functional(515) : see reference to function template instantiation 'void std::_Func_class<_Ret,_V0_t>::_Reset_alloc<_Fret,Zot,std::allocator<_Ty>>(_Fret (__thiscall Zot::* const )(void),_Alloc)' being compiled
1>          with
1>          [
1>              _Ret=int,
1>              _V0_t=Zot *,
1>              _Fret=int,
1>              _Ty=std::_Func_class<int,Zot *>,
1>              _Alloc=std::allocator<std::_Func_class<int,Zot *>>
1>          ]
1>          vc\include\functional(515) : see reference to function template instantiation 'void std::_Func_class<_Ret,_V0_t>::_Reset_alloc<_Fret,Zot,std::allocator<_Ty>>(_Fret (__thiscall Zot::* const )(void),_Alloc)' being compiled
1>          with
1>          [
1>              _Ret=int,
1>              _V0_t=Zot *,
1>              _Fret=int,
1>              _Ty=std::_Func_class<int,Zot *>,
1>              _Alloc=std::allocator<std::_Func_class<int,Zot *>>
1>          ]
1>          vc\include\functional(675) : see reference to function template instantiation 'void std::_Func_class<_Ret,_V0_t>::_Reset<int,Zot>(_Fret (__thiscall Zot::* const )(void))' being compiled
1>          with
1>          [
1>              _Ret=int,
1>              _V0_t=Zot *,
1>              _Fret=int
1>          ]
1>          vc\include\functional(675) : see reference to function template instantiation 'void std::_Func_class<_Ret,_V0_t>::_Reset<int,Zot>(_Fret (__thiscall Zot::* const )(void))' being compiled
1>          with
1>          [
1>              _Ret=int,
1>              _V0_t=Zot *,
1>              _Fret=int
1>          ]
1>          c:\..\cxx11.cpp(17) : see reference to function template instantiation 'std::function<_Fty>::function<int(__thiscall Zot::* )(void)>(_Fx &&)' being compiled
1>          with
1>          [
1>              _Fty=int (Zot *),
1>              _Fx=int (__thiscall Zot::* )(void)
1>          ]
1>          c:\...\cxx11.cpp(17) : see reference to function template instantiation 'std::function<_Fty>::function<int(__thiscall Zot::* )(void)>(_Fx &&)' being compiled
1>          with
1>          [
1>              _Fty=int (Zot *),
1>              _Fx=int (__thiscall Zot::* )(void)
1>          ]
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T09:39:18+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 9:39 am

    Yes, it should work. One of the requirements on the functor argument for any of the appropriate constructor (e.g. template<class F> function(F f);) of std::function<R(ArgsTypes...)> is:

    f shall be Callable (20.8.11.2) for argument types ArgTypes and return type R.

    (20.8.11.2.1 functionconstruct/copy/destroy [func.wrap.func.con])

    In turn, “Callable for argument types ArgTypes and return type R” is a Standard quasi-concept (for lack of concepts) defined in terms of the pseudo-expression INVOKE(f, declval<ArgTypes>()..., R). This pseudo-expression unifies regular functors, which are invoked with the usual call syntax (e.g. f(a, b, c)), with pointers to members which have their own quirks (e.g. p->*a or (r.*a)(b, c)). INVOKE is defined in 20.8.2 Requirements [func.require].

    Furthermore, the effects of using the call operator of std::function include INVOKE(f, std::forward<ArgTypes>(args)..., R) (20.8.11.2.4 function invocation [func.wrap.func.inv]), meaning that the ‘right’ thing is done for pointers to members.

    There are in fact a lot of other things that are also defined in terms of Callable/INVOKE in the Standard, like std::bind, std::thread, std::reference_wrapper and std::result_of*.

    *: in particular this means that something like

    template<typename Functor>
    typename std::result_of<Functor()>::type apply(Functor functor)
    { return std::forward<Functor>(functor)(); }
    

    is problematic at least for that reason.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know why the following code doesn't compile: public class Main { public static
why following code doesn't compile ? class aa1 <String> { public void fun(){ String
The following code doesn't work: class String{ public: char* str; int* counter; String(){ str
In C#, the following code doesn't compile: class Foo { public string Foo; }
I'm trying to understand why the following code doesn't compile. class X { public:
dose php5 forbid this usage, the following code doesn't work class Foo{ public static
Take the following code: std::vector<std::vector<int>> v(10, 10); This code doesn't compile with libstdc++. It
The following code doesn't work (of course), because the marked line does not compile:
The following code doesn't compile ( error CS0123: No overload for 'System.Convert.ToString(object)' matches delegate
The following code doesn't compile for obvious reasons, namely that Foo is trying to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.