Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 130231
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T05:54:55+00:00 2026-05-11T05:54:55+00:00

The following code is generating a stack overflow error for me int main(int argc,

  • 0

The following code is generating a stack overflow error for me

int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {     int sieve[2000000];     return 0; } 

How do I get around this? I am using Turbo C++ but would like to keep my code in C

EDIT:

Thanks for the advice. The code above was only for example, I actually declare the array in a function and not in sub main. Also, I needed the array to be initialized to zeros, so when I googled malloc, I discovered that calloc was perfect for my purposes.

Malloc/calloc also has the advantage over allocating on the stack of allowing me to declare the size using a variable.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T05:54:56+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:54 am

    Your array is way too big to fit into the stack, consider using the heap:

    int *sieve = malloc(2000000 * sizeof(*sieve)); 

    If you really want to change the stack size, take a look at this document.

    Tip: – Don’t forget to free your dynamically allocated memory when it’s no-longer needed.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 499k
  • Answers 500k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is not pretty but it works: rm -R $(ls… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes. Override the base1 and base2 methods in Derived to… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No, you can't. Unfortunately, UIEvent doesn't expose any public way… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I have the following Rails link generating code (I have removed potentially 'industry secret'
I am generating the scala AST using the following code: val setting = new
I've been trying to figure out why the following code is not generating any
Following code works def lab Proc.new { return foo1 }.call return foo2 end puts
The following code puts a cube at (0, 0, 0) and another at (0,
The following code does not generate a compiler warning in D6. Can I make
I'm trying to do the following: User goes to web page, uploads XLS file
I have the following 3 rails classes, which are all stored in one table,
I keep getting the following InvalidOperationException : The relationship between the two objects cannot
I'm using the ASM Java library to replace some reflection. I generate the body

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.