Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6777447
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T16:08:55+00:00 2026-05-26T16:08:55+00:00

The following code (taken from here ): int* ptr = int(); compiles in Visual

  • 0

The following code (taken from here):

int* ptr = int();

compiles in Visual C++ and value-initializes the pointer.

How is that possible? I mean int() yields an object of type int and I can’t assign an int to a pointer.

How is the code above not illegal?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T16:08:56+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 4:08 pm

    int() is a constant expression with a value of 0, so it’s a valid way of producing a null pointer constant. Ultimately, it’s just a slightly different way of saying int *ptr = NULL;

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

How should I understand $(select option:selected) in the following code ? (taken from here
I have the following code, (taken from here), but it causes a stackoverflow exception
I have the following piece of code taken from the PHP manual on the
The following code is a combination of samples taken from red5. Basically I am
Hey all, the following is a snippet of code taken from the unix ptx
I want to write code that compiles conditionally and according to the following two
The following C# code takes 5 minutes to run: int i = 1; string
The output from the following code is 123 because substring takes from beginIndex to
Here's the code: for(int i = 0; i < personListViewController.peopleCount; i++) { [NSThread detachNewThreadSelector:@selector(getPerson:)
The following is an excerpt from a code sample in K&R's The C Programming

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.