Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8535615
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T10:28:23+00:00 2026-06-11T10:28:23+00:00

The following compiles under VS2010 (Express) but not gcc (4.6.2 here). Lockable.h: #include <boost/thread/mutex.hpp>

  • 0

The following compiles under VS2010 (Express) but not gcc (4.6.2 here).

Lockable.h:

#include <boost/thread/mutex.hpp>
#include <boost/interprocess/sync/scoped_lock.hpp>

template<typename T>
class LockedProxy : boost::noncopyable
{
public:
    inline LockedProxy(boost::mutex & m, T * obj)
        :lock(m),
        t(obj)
    {}
    inline LockedProxy(const LockedProxy && other)
        :lock(std::move(other.lock)),
        t(std::move(other.t))
    {}

    inline       T * operator->()       { return t; }
    inline const T * operator->() const { return t; }

    inline const T & operator*() const { return *t; }
    inline       T & operator*()       { return *t; }

private:
    boost::interprocess::scoped_lock<boost::mutex> lock;
    T * t;
};


template<typename T>
class Lockable
{
public:

    // Convenience typefed for subclasses to use
    typedef T LockableObjectType;

    inline Lockable(const T & t)
        :lockableObject(t)
    {}

    inline LockedProxy<LockableObjectType> GetLockedProxy() {
        return LockedProxy<LockableObjectType>(mutex, &lockableObject);
    }

protected:
    LockableObjectType lockableObject;
    boost::mutex mutex;
};

main.cpp:

#include <iostream>
#include <string.h>
#include "Lockable.h"    

void f(Lockable<std::string> & str)
{
    auto proxy = str.GetLockedProxy();

    *proxy = "aa";
    proxy->append("bb");

    std::cout << "str = " << *proxy << std::endl;
}

void g(Lockable<int> & i)
{
    { // reduce lock's lifespan
        auto proxy = i.GetLockedProxy();
        *proxy = 321;
    }

    // relock, lock lives for the statement
    std::cout << "i = " << *i.GetLockedProxy() << std::endl;
}

int main()
{
    Lockable<std::string> str("abc");
    //Can't use str here, it is not locked
    f(str);

    Lockable<int> i(123);
    g(i);

    return 0;
}

The errors:

In file included from main.cpp:3:0:
C:/Users/DrGibbs/Documents/code/boost_1_46_0/boost/interprocess/sync/scoped_lock.hpp: In constructor 'LockedProxy<T>::LockedProxy(const LockedProxy<T>&&) [with T = std::basic_string<char>, LockedProxy<T> = LockedProxy<std::basic_string<char> >]':main.cpp:7:37:   instantiated from here
C:/Users/DrGibbs/Documents/code/boost_1_46_0/boost/interprocess/sync/scoped_lock.hpp:56:4: error: 'boost::interprocess::scoped_lock<Mutex>::scoped_lock(const boost::interprocess::scoped_lock<Mutex>&)[with Mutex = boost::mutex, boost::interprocess::scoped_lock<Mutex> = boost::interprocess::scoped_lock<boost::mutex>]' is privateLockable.h:14:29: error: within this context
C:/Users/DrGibbs/Documents/code/boost_1_46_0/boost/interprocess/sync/scoped_lock.hpp: In constructor 'LockedProxy<T>::LockedProxy(const LockedProxy<T>&&) [with T = int, LockedProxy<T> = LockedProxy<int>]':
main.cpp:18:36:   instantiated from here
C:/Users/DrGibbs/Documents/code/boost_1_46_0/boost/interprocess/sync/scoped_lock.hpp:56:4: error: 'boost::interprocess::scoped_lock<Mutex>::scoped_lock(const boost::interprocess::scoped_lock<Mutex>&)[with Mutex = boost::mutex, boost::interprocess::scoped_lock<Mutex> = boost::interprocess::scoped_lock<boost::mutex>]' is private
Lockable.h:14:29: error: within this context

Well as far as I understand, in LockedProxy‘s move-constructor, the scoped_lock is not moved but copy-constructed, which really should not work. Shouldn’t the std::move guanrantee its move-construction ? What am I missing ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T10:28:24+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 10:28 am

    Your move constructor declares its parameter const:

    inline LockedProxy(const LockedProxy && other)
    

    It should be declared non-const:

    inline LockedProxy(LockedProxy && other)
    

    Your std::move(other.lock) is taking other.lock as a const reference, and so returning a const rvalue reference const boost::interprocess::scoped_lock<boost::mutex> &&, which cannot be passed to the move constructor of boost::interprocess::scoped_lock<boost::mutex>.

    See also C++0x const RValue reference as function parameter, which explains that const rvalue references are almost entirely useless.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The following code compiles fine under Visual C++ 2010, but not under GCC 4.6
I have following piece of code: It compiles without problems under gcc-3.4, gcc-4.3, intel
The following code compiles in Visual C++ and gcc, but fails with Code Warrior
the following code compiles with Visual Studio 2008 but not with g++ on Mac
The following compiles in Visual Studio but fails to compile under g++. int main()
The following example code compiles under gcc and works as I would hope. It
The following code compiles without warnings under GCC 4.2, and as far as I
The following code compiles correctly under VC++ 8 on XPSP3, but running it causes
The following code compiles fine with manual memory management, but fails under ARC: CALayer
Under MonoTouch the following line of code compiles, but generates an InvalidProgramException: var bytes

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.