Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 518199
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T07:54:46+00:00 2026-05-13T07:54:46+00:00

The following example is from the book ‘Programming in Scala’. Given a class ‘Rational’

  • 0

The following example is from the book ‘Programming in Scala’. Given a class ‘Rational’ and the following method definition:

def add(that: Rational): Rational =
    new Rational(
        this.numer * that.denom + that.numer * this.denom,
        this.denom * that.denom
    )

I can successfully overload the add method with a convenience version that takes an Int argument, and makes use of the definition above:

def add(that: Int): Rational =
    add(new Rational(that, 1))

No problems so far.

Now, if I change the method name to an operator style name:

def +(that: Rational): Rational =
    new Rational(
        this.numer * that.denom + that.numer * this.denom,
        this.denom * that.denom
    )

And overload like so:

def +(that: Int): Rational =
    +(new Rational(that, 1))

I get the following compile error:

(fragment of Rational.scala):19: error: value unary_+ is not a member of this.Rational
+(new Rational(that, 1))
 ^

Why is the compiler looking for a unary version of the + method?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T07:54:46+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:54 am

    In Scala, any construct of the type +x, -x, ~x and !x is transformed into a method call x.unary_+, etc. This is partially to allow Java-like syntax of having !b as the negation of the boolean b, or -x as the negation of the number x.

    Therefore, the code snippet +(new Rational(that, 1)) is translated into (new Rational(that,1)).unary_+, and as Rational doesn’t have this method, you get a compile error. You will get this error only if your function is called +, -, ~ or ! as these are the only characters Scala allows as unary operators. For example, if you called your function @+, the code compiles just fine.

    Though, I would suggest writing the overridden add function as:

    def +(that: Int): Rational =
      this + (new Rational(that, 1))
    

    This code shows the intent of your function better — you add a new Rational constructed from an integer as a numerator and 1 as denominator to this. This way of writing gets translated into this.+(new Rational(that, 1)), which is what you want — invoking the + function on this.

    Note that you can use the infix notation however the function is called. For example, if you change the name back to add, you can still keep the definition as:

    def add(that: Int): Rational =
      this add (new Rational(that, 1))
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.