Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 103927
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T01:12:04+00:00 2026-05-11T01:12:04+00:00

The following method does not compile. Visual Studio warns An out parameter may not

  • 0

The following method does not compile. Visual Studio warns ‘An out parameter may not be used within an anonymous method’. The WithReaderLock(Proc action) method takes a delegate void Proc().

public Boolean TryGetValue(TKey key, out TValue value) {     Boolean got = false;     WithReaderLock(delegate     {         got = dictionary.TryGetValue(key, out value);     });     return got; } 

What’s the best way to get this behavior? (Please refrain from providing advice on threadsafe dictionaries, this question is intended to solve the out parameter problem in general).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T01:12:05+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:12 am
    public bool TryGetValue(TKey key, out TValue value) {     bool got = false;                 TValue tmp = default(TValue); // for definite assignment     WithReaderLock(delegate     {         got = dictionary.TryGetValue(key, out tmp);     });     value = tmp;     return got; } 

    (edited – small bug)

    For info, in .NET 3.5 you might want to use the Action delegate instead of rolling your own, since people will recognise it more. Even in 2.0, there are lots of void Foo() delegates: ThreadStart, MethodInvoker, etc – but Action is the easiest to follow ;-p

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 147k
  • Answers 147k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Group.Where(x => x != null) .SelectMany(g => combination.Where(c => c… May 12, 2026 at 9:13 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You need a Content-Disposition header: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=my_backup.xml May 12, 2026 at 9:13 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If all you want is a cross platform way to… May 12, 2026 at 9:13 am

Related Questions

I see lots of TDD practitioners following this cycle: 1) Write your test as
Visual Studio and SharpDevelop do not both set up delegates to handle events in
This behavior is so bizarre that I don't even know how best to ask
I'm trying to build the following block of code in a 1-file .cpp file:

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.