Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 134417
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T06:36:34+00:00 2026-05-11T06:36:34+00:00

The following .NET 3.5 code, placed in an aspx file, will trigger a JavaScript

  • 0

The following .NET 3.5 code, placed in an aspx file, will trigger a JavaScript error when the page is loaded (for users who have JavaScript enabled):

<noscript>     <asp:TextBox ID='txt' runat='server'></asp:TextBox>     <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID='txt_RequiredFieldValidator' runat='server'        ControlToValidate='txt'></asp:RequiredFieldValidator>     <asp:Button ID='btn' runat='server' Text='Button' /> </noscript> 

The error happens because the JavaScript generated by the ASP.NET validator control does not contain a null check on before the second code line below:

var ctl00_body_txt_RequiredFieldValidator =   document.all ?     document.all['ctl00_body_txt_RequiredFieldValidator'] :     document.getElementById('ctl00_body_txt_RequiredFieldValidator');  ctl00_body_txt_RequiredFieldValidator.controltovalidate = 'ctl00_body_txt'; 

Can anyone suggest a workaround to this?


Footnote: Why am I doing this? For my non-JavaScript users I am replacing some AJAX functionality with some different UI components, which need validation.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T06:36:35+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:36 am

    You should add the following to the RequiredFieldValidator:

    enableclientscript='false' 

    Seeing as you are using these in <noscript> tags, there is no point in supplying client side vaildation of the controls – they are only going to display if JS is turned off.

    This will force the validation to happen (automatically) on the server side for you.

    Just make sure you call ‘Page.IsValid‘ before you process the response.

    See BaseValidator.EnableClientScript for more details.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 120k
  • Answers 120k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Creating classes that do nothing except extending already existing collections… May 12, 2026 at 12:04 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Check out my post on the github issue for a… May 12, 2026 at 12:04 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Did you forget to add MyDataClassesDataContext _db = new MyDataClassesDataContext();… May 12, 2026 at 12:04 am

Related Questions

EDIT 2: Well, I went to the code. Note what they are doing here.
I've had this intermittent issue when using asp.net. My site is dynamically compiled. Sometimes
I am having a really hard time attempting to debug LINQ to SQL and
I have the following web config file. I am having some difficulty in retrieving

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.