Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 578337
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T14:14:58+00:00 2026-05-13T14:14:58+00:00

The following seems to be a reasonable use of __caller__ : var foo=1; function

  • 0

The following seems to be a reasonable use of __caller__:

var foo=1;
function a() {
    var foo=2;
    function b() {
        var foo=3;
        foo; // 3
        this.foo; // 1, from global
        __caller__.foo // 2
    }
    b();
}
a(); // creates a's execution context

However, __caller__ is not available. Why not? If the global context/variable object can be accessed using this, then why not a‘s?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T14:14:58+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 2:14 pm

    Doc says:

    The special property __caller__, which returned the activation object of the caller thus allowing to reconstruct the stack, was removed for security reasons.

    And it is easy to see why this could be a security disaster in a browser where much of the UI is implemented in JavaScript. Imagine having one of your functions called by an add-on or other chrome. You could look up the call stack and read callers’ (potentially sensitive) variables, or even inject JavaScript values into caller functions, potentially subverting them to do something against the user’s wishes. Effectively every web page would get chrome security privileges and completely compromise the browser.

    You certainly should never have used it in real JavaScript, because it was a non-standard Mozilla-only implementation detail, not to mention incredibly ugly. It does not have the lexical behaviour you normally expect of JS.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have absolutely no idea why this is happening but the following code seems
I'm following this tutorial (seems good) for Rails. After I run ruby script/generate scaffold
The following code seems reasonable to me. It should create the object and then
The following seems strange.. Basically, the somedata attribute seems shared between all the classes
The following code seems to be just too much, for getting a single count
I can't believe that the following statement seems to be still true So, I
I have the following code that seems like it should set my insertParameter but
Maybe someone found a workaround for the following problem: It seems as if AXIS
It seems that the following piece of HTML is ignored in IE7 but works
It seems that the following is a common method given in many tutorials on

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.