Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 477911
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T00:38:19+00:00 2026-05-13T00:38:19+00:00

The following SQL run against a table with 1 million records is giving the

  • 0

The following SQL run against a table with 1 million records is giving the same value for columns Date1 and Date2, and it took 38 seconds to execute. Is this an expected behavior and why?

CREATE FUNCTION Fn_Test(@a decimal)RETURNS TABLE
AS
RETURN
(
    SELECT @a Parameter, Getdate() Date1, PartitionTest.*
    FROM PartitionTest
);

SELECT *, GETDATE() Date2 FROM Fn_Test(RAND(DATEPART(s,GETDATE())))

Is this some kind of caching?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T00:38:19+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:38 am

    Yes. SQL semantics do no require that a non-deterministic function that does not depend on the current row to be evaluated for each row. It is allowed to evaluate the function once and return the same value for all subsequent rows.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to run a query in SQL Server 2008 against a table where
Can not run following SQL from ant's sql task : BEGIN DBMS_AQADM.CREATE_QUEUE_TABLE( queue_table =>
If I run the following SQL query SELECT * FROM A LEFT JOIN B
I would like to run the following SQL select: SELECT ID, NUMERATOR, (SELECT m.COLUMNNAME
In java-jdbc, I can easily run the following SQL (NOTE the double quotes around
I get the following error from the SQL Script I am trying to run:
I have the following SQL table - Date StoreNo Sales 23/4 34 4323.00 23/4
I have the following SQL table: A|B --- w|x x|w y|z z|y Can I
I have a Premiums table that I attempting to query using the following LINQ-to-SQL:
In SQL it is possible to run inserts and updates against a view, as

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.