Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7693557
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T21:07:01+00:00 2026-05-31T21:07:01+00:00

The full specializations of std::atomic for integral types provide arithmetic compound assignment operators such

  • 0

The full specializations of std::atomic for integral types provide arithmetic compound assignment operators such as +=, -=, but no *= or /=. The standard states this but as far as I can see there is no reason given. Could someone familiar with the reasoning behind the Atomic Operations Library section shed some light on this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T21:07:03+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 9:07 pm

    I think this is related to hardware. Many platforms have atomics to handle += but I don’t know of any that offers *=. Implementing this through locking would be simple, but the interface of std::atomic would be mixing at the same level operations that are somehow cheap with very expensive operations.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Full disclaimer: this is not really a homework, but I tagged it as such
Full disclosure : This is for a homework assignment. This is driving me nuts.
I am trying to define a full specialization of std::basic_string< char, char_traits<char>, allocator<char> >
The full error is The base class includes the field 'ScriptManager1', but its type
Full disclosure, this is part of a homework assignment (though a small snippet, the
full disclosure - this is for a homework assignment. And I normally would not
Full disclaimer: I'm a CS student, and this question is related to a recently
Full disclosure, I'm new to Visual Studio Web Tests and coding for them. I've
For full control of your application, do you prefer a GridView or a HTML
How full-screen mode, like in web browsers, for application running under Windows OS is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.