Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 773771
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T19:01:09+00:00 2026-05-14T19:01:09+00:00

The IETF recommends using base64 encoding for binary cookie values: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-07 So I use

  • 0

The IETF recommends using base64 encoding for binary cookie values:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-07

So I use setrawcookie(..) but I don’t know what variable to use to get the cookie back because $_COOKIE[..] still uses the URL decoding that matches setcookie(..). This replaces "+" with " " in the output.

<?php

var_dump($_COOKIE['TEST']);
$binary_string = "";
for($index = 0; $index < 256; $index++){
    $binary_string .= chr($index);
}
$encoded_data = base64_encode($binary_string);
var_dump($encoded_data);
$cookie_set = setrawcookie('TEST', $encoded_data, time() + 3600);
?>
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T19:01:10+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 7:01 pm

    You should use normal setcookie instead setrawcookie, this way you can avoid situation when trying to send cookie with not allowed characters (cookie will not be set) and it’s value in $_COOKIE array will be usable.

    If you insist on raw method, you can find cookies send by browser in $_SERVER['HTTP_COOKIE']. This will be string formatted like key1=value1; key2=value2. One way to get it in array is to do simple exploding:

    foreach(explode('; ',$_SERVER['HTTP_COOKIE']) as $rawcookie)
    {
        list($k,$v) = explode('=',$rawcookie, 2);
        $_RAWCOOKIE[$k] = $v;
    }
    
    var_dump($_RAWCOOKIE);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to develop the handshake for websocket hybi-17 protocol ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-17 ). According
I'm folowing Apple's proposal in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-01 . Trying a dummy HTTP Live Streaming to
I'm working on a C# WebSocket server (currently supported by https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-17 ). The server
This https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.uri.query.aspx and this https://ietf.org/rfc/rfc1738.txt suggest that the .Net Uri class does not recognize
I am running a TURN server (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5766) on a server that is behind a
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML//EN> <html> <head> <title>How to Write a Good Report</title> <style
I read document: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3569.txt I also had a look at http://wiki.treck.com/IGMPv3 I am confused
My understanding from reading the specification ( http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2445.txt ) is that the : character
My library has dependency on org.ietf.jgss package which is not included in the android.jar.
Does anybody know what happened to the IETF draft regarding the standardization of the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.