Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 510095
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T07:04:42+00:00 2026-05-13T07:04:42+00:00

The Jobs API in Eclipse RCP apparently works much differently than I expected. I

  • 0

The Jobs API in Eclipse RCP apparently works much differently than I expected. I thought that creating and scheduling multiple Jobs would actually cause multiple worker threads to be created, executing the Jobs in parallel unless there was an ISchedulingRule conflict.

I went back and read the documentation more closely, and also discovered this comment in the JobManager class:

/**
 * Returns a running or blocked job whose scheduling rule conflicts with the 
 * scheduling rule of the given waiting job.  Returns null if there are no 
 * conflicting jobs.  A job can only run if there are no running jobs and no blocked
 * jobs whose scheduling rule conflicts with its rule.
 */

Now it looks to me like the Job manager will only ever attempt to use one background worker thread. Am I completely wrong about this? If I’m right,

  • what is the point of scheduling rules and locks? If there is only one worker thread, Jobs can never preemt each other. Wouldn’t these only ever be used in case a Job’s sleep() method is called (e.g. sleeping while holding a Lock)?
  • does any part of the platform allow two Jobs to actually run concurrently, on multiple worker threads, thus making the above features useful somehow?

What am I missing here?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T07:04:42+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:04 am

    Take a look at the run method in the documentation, specifically this part:

    Jobs can optionally finish their
    execution asynchronously (in another
    thread)
    by returning a result status
    of ASYNC_FINISH. Jobs that finish
    asynchronously must specify the
    execution thread by calling setThread,
    and must indicate when they are
    finished by calling the method done.

    ASYNC_FINISH there looks interresting.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Our server web app will handle jobs that are requested by REST API requests.
We have several jobs that run concurrently that have to use the same config
I have many jobs that have a step to send 1 specific email out
I have a list of about 600 jobs that I can't delete from the
When I have two mysql servers that have different jobs (holding different databases) but
I have a view that has a list of jobs in it, with data
The Twitter streaming api says that we should open a HTTP request and parse
Does anybody know a Java implementation of the DRMAA-API that is known to work
I have a job upstream that executes 4 downstream jobs. If the upstream job
By default concurrent manager jobs are run under the APPS user. Is it possible

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.