Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7411409
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T06:22:57+00:00 2026-05-29T06:22:57+00:00

The latest cabal-install that I’ve been using (0.13.3, from the darcs repo) is nice;

  • 0

The latest cabal-install that I’ve been using (0.13.3, from the darcs repo) is nice; it lets you know when you might break your GHC installation with reinstalls. What I want to know is this: suppose a cabal install foo would perform a reinstall that would break my GHC. What would happen if I cabal-dev install foo instead? Would I be able to avoid breaking GHC? Could I actually make use of the foo package in a cabal-dev sandbox, or would it just be a broken sandbox?

Example: yesod, GHC 7.4.1, cabal-dev 0.9 built from github source, Cabal 1.14.0 library.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T06:22:57+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 6:22 am

    Just to clarify, if I am understanding you right, you are not breaking GHC in either case. I believe you are referring to installing a package, which then reinstalls one of the underlying dependencies of another package, therefore breaking that other package’s dependency chain and preventing it from properly working/compiling when used. Simply removing .ghc from your home folder and re-doing cabal installs typically resolves this problem, albeit in a really painful way.

    When you use cabal-dev, all the cabal install steps and ghc-pkg register steps are done in a local sandbox environment. Your global/user ghc packages are not at all touched. Since you typically instantiate one cabal-dev sandbox per project, clashes like described above don’t typically happen.

    To get to your question – it depends entirely on what is already installed in that particular cabal-dev sandbox. If there are no conflicts, it wouldn’t break anything. If you are forcing a --reinstall, you might have to --reinstall any packages in the local cabal-dev sandbox that depend on the package you just reinstalled.

    In any case, your GHC installation itself would not break (or be altered in any way) and you can always rm -rf cabal-dev under your project folder and redo cabal-dev install.

    Hope this helps.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm using the latest WCF DataServices 5.1rc. I know that the derived type navigation
The latest link I can find is from last may and that's Beta 1.
The latest releases of the facebook-actionscript-api caters to actionscript 3.0 does anyone know from
I was trying to install haskeline, it's my first time installing using cabal, and
The latest I can find from the web and blogosphere indicate that Microsoft's XML
Using latest JAXB (Sun) and have a hierarchy of schemas that use import directives
Using latest php in order to create a function that adds a row to
From latest SDK, multi-touch is supported via tethered phone. I'm wondering whether it is
I am using latest Pyramid to build a web app. Somehow we have started
I have install the latest Xcode but this keep occurring. How could I solve

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.