Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 896685
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T14:46:02+00:00 2026-05-15T14:46:02+00:00

The linker is reporting multiply defined errors for an inline function. I have the

  • 0

The linker is reporting multiply defined errors for an inline function.

I have the following code in a header file:

struct Port_Pin
{
    volatile uint32_t *     port_addr_set_value;    //!< Writing the pin value here sets the pin to high.
    volatile uint32_t *     port_addr_clr_value;    //!< Writing the pin value to this port clears the pin to low.
    volatile uint32_t *     port_addr_read_value;   //!< Address to read pin value.
    volatile uint32_t *     port_addr_enable;       //!< Writing the pin value here enables the pin (for reading or writing).
    volatile uint32_t *     port_addr_disable;      //!< Writing the pin value here disables the pin.
    volatile uint32_t *     port_addr_dir_output;   //!< Writing the pin value here sets the pin as an output.
    volatile uint32_t *     port_addr_dir_input;    //!< Writing the pin value here sets the pin as an input.
    unsigned int            pin_bit_position;       //!< Zero based, where position zero is first bit position.
};

inline void
Write_Port_Pin(const struct Port_Pin *  p_port,
               uint8_t                  bit)
{
    volatile uint32_t * port_addr = 0;
    port_addr = ((bit & 1) == 0) ? p_port->port_addr_clr_value
        : p_port->port_addr_set_value;
    *port_addr = 1 << p_port->pin_bit_position;
    return;
}

I include the header file in more than one source (.c) file.

I would like to have the above function pasted inline wherever it is called.
Is there a technique for this without have multiple definitions of the function in each source file that is included? If yes, please provide example.

I need the performance optimization for an embedded platform.
Are compilers or linkers smart enough to inline functions when they are defined in other translation units?

I am using Green Hills compiler, 4.2.4 on an embedded ARM9 platform. Assume pre-2000 C language standard. This is C code not C++.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T14:46:03+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 2:46 pm

    inline is just a suggestion, not a command. However, in general compilers are smart enough to do the right thing ( and Green Hills has a good reputation in so far as optimizations go ).

    Make the function ‘static inline’, which will prevent the compiler from making the symbol exportable. That should fix your multiple definition link errors… the linker is complaining that the same function is exported from several source modules.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 499k
  • Answers 500k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is not pretty but it works: rm -R $(ls… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes. Override the base1 and base2 methods in Derived to… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No, you can't. Unfortunately, UIEvent doesn't expose any public way… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

My linker is reporting an error as follows: unresolved external symbol unsigned char __fastcall
I have a Subversion working copy with at least one missing file (the local
I have a data processing system that generates very large reports on the data
I am having a discussion with someone about the following table that is used
I've got an Access MDB I use for reporting that has linked table views
Apparently the speed of the C++ linker in Visual Studio 2010 hasn't improved that
Greetings, Here is my SConstruct file: env = Environment() env.Append(CCFLAGS=['-g','-pg']) env.Program(target='program1', source= ['program1.c']) Also
I'm trying to figure out which credentials I should be storing to enable use
This shouldn't be a difficult question, but I'd just like someone to bounce it
I've got a big-ish project that needs a lot of work on a new

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.