Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6346453
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T21:01:13+00:00 2026-05-24T21:01:13+00:00

The MSDN documentation for the Flag attribute says that you should: Define enumeration constants

  • 0

The MSDN documentation for the Flag attribute says that you should:

Define enumeration constants in powers of two, that is, 1, 2, 4, 8,
and so on. This means the individual flags in combined enumeration
constants do not overlap.

…and of course I always try to remember to do that. However, nothing enforce that and if you just create an enumeration the ‘basic’ way like…

[Flags]
public enum BrokenEnum
{
    None,
    FirstOption,
    SecondOption,
    ThirdOption
}

…it won’t behave as expected. To combat this, I’m looking for some kind of static code analysis (like FxCop) that can warn me when an enum like the one above exists in my code. The closest such warning I could find was ‘CA1008: Enums should have zero value‘ – which is also helpful for designing flags enumeration correctly but isn’t enough.

What is the best way to find incorrectly designed flags enums in my code? The more automated the solution, the better.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T21:01:14+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 9:01 pm

    As Jacob says, it can be useful to have mixtures of flags… but possibly you could indicate that somehow so that your detection doesn’t mind.

    It shouldn’t be too hard to write a unit test which goes through every enum in an assembly decorated with [Flags] and checks that there’s a value for 0 (possibly ensuring it’s called None or Default) and that every other defined value (from Enum.GetValues()) is a power of two. You can check that using if ((x & (x - 1)) == 0).

    You could potentially have something like an attribute [Combination] to indicate values which are designed to be combinations… they could even indicate what flag names they’re meant to be combinations of, so you could check that too.

    I know this isn’t quite as good as a compile-time check, but assuming you’re already running tests regularly, it’s pretty close.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The MSDN documentation says that public class SomeObject { public void SomeOperation() { lock(this)
The MSDN documentation says that you must define accessors for your custom attached DependencyProperties:
The MSDN documentation indicates that this API is not limited to Windows Mobile, but
The msdn documentation of the System.IDisposable interface states that The primary use of this
The msdn documentation says add namespaces imports to the CodeNamespace.Imports collection. This puts them
MSDN documentation says The Show Data Sources command is only available in projects that
MSDN documentation says that instance methods, which includes Stream.Write, of Stream class are not
The MSDN documentation (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb174425%28v=vs.85%29.aspx) says that Direct3D 9 applications can expect messages to be
The MSDN documentation isn't precise on this point. It says in one place: Gets
On the MSDN documentation for Lazy.Force<T> extension method says: Forces the execution of this

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.