Question

The normal approach to writing functions in R (as I understand) is to avoid side-effects and return a value from a function.

contained <- function(x) {
  x_squared <- x^2
  return(x_squared)
}

In this case, the value computed from the input into the function is returned. But the variable x_squared is not available.

But if you need to violate this basic functional programming tenet (and I’m not sure how serious R is about this issue) and return an object from a function, you have two choices.

escape <- function(x){
  x_squared  <<- x^2
  assign("x_times_x", x*x, envir = .GlobalEnv)
}

Both objects x_squared and x_times_x are returned. Is one method preferable to the other and why so?

Answer 1

Thomas Lumley answers this in a superb post on r-help the other day. <<- is about the enclosing environment so you can do thing like this (and again, I quote his post from April 22 in this thread):

make.accumulator<-function(){
    a <- 0
    function(x) {
        a <<- a + x
        a
    }
}

> f<-make.accumulator()
> f(1)
[1] 1
> f(1)
[1] 2
> f(11)
[1] 13
> f(11)
[1] 24

This is a legitimate use of <<- as "super-assignment" with lexical scope. And not simply to assign in the global environment. For that, Thomas has these choice words:

The Evil and Wrong use is to modify
variables in the global environment.

Very good advice.